Hi, I have no idea what letter people are referring to at this time. I do not, however, feel at all comfortable with the way the process is being run. And the only letter I have approved is the one that Mary provided. SCI has always been a deliberative body. We discuss things more that once and allow time to ask questions, especially of those who cannot attend a meeting. Several groups have adopted a practice of never making a decsion in one meeting. This seems like a excellent practices. And while in the past that has never been a problem, we seem to be adopting a new pace that may make such a practice necessary. As for consensus, we tried to achieve that with discussion. As for the report, having thought about it a bit more, I think you should be able to make you own report remotely Anne, as required by the charter. Or perhaps Lori as vice chair can do it. I will give a brief liaison report. thanks avri On 27-Jan-15 16:22, Angie Graves wrote:
Dear Anne,
I agree with your revised letter to Jonathan.
Thank you for your time on this.
Angie
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@ascd.org <mailto:lori.schulman@ascd.org>> wrote:
Dear Anne,
Thank you for the concise run down of events and positions. I agree with your proposal on how to proceed with the report and the request for direction.
Lori
* *