Action items from yesterday's meeting
Dear All, Thank you for participating in yesterday's SCI meeting. Please note the action items below. With best regards, Marika Notes / Action Items SCI Meeting of 6 February 2013 * NCSG has appointed Stefania Milan as an alternate member to the SCI * Item 4. Council liaison - Ron to send letter to the GNSO Council to suggest two options: 1) SCI Chair or Vice-Chair to participate as an observer in GNSO Council meetings, 2) appoint a GNSO Council liaison * Item 5. Marika to propose edits to latest version of the language on termination and suspension for further consideration by the SCI. To be reviewed / discussed at the next meeting. * Item 6. J. Scott to update language as proposed in the chat (amend pt 2 to say "In the event no one candidate receives a clear majority, the GNSO Secretariat will conduct an election between the two candidates receiving the most votes via email ballot and tally the results afte one week.") (completed, please see http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg00635.html) * Item 7. Consider further forming a sub-team to consider possible changes to the charter at the next meeting. Staff to review why full consensus requirement was included in the charter. Move this item up on the next agenda.
I would likely add as to "Reconsideration of a Motion at GNSO" that the sub-team will conference Monday and report back at the next meeting. [cid:954144721@07022013-2507]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:30 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from yesterday's meeting Dear All, Thank you for participating in yesterday's SCI meeting. Please note the action items below. With best regards, Marika Notes / Action Items SCI Meeting of 6 February 2013 * NCSG has appointed Stefania Milan as an alternate member to the SCI * Item 4. Council liaison - Ron to send letter to the GNSO Council to suggest two options: 1) SCI Chair or Vice-Chair to participate as an observer in GNSO Council meetings, 2) appoint a GNSO Council liaison * Item 5. Marika to propose edits to latest version of the language on termination and suspension for further consideration by the SCI. To be reviewed / discussed at the next meeting. * Item 6. J. Scott to update language as proposed in the chat (amend pt 2 to say "In the event no one candidate receives a clear majority, the GNSO Secretariat will conduct an election between the two candidates receiving the most votes via email ballot and tally the results afte one week.") (completed, please see http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg00635.html) * Item 7. Consider further forming a sub-team to consider possible changes to the charter at the next meeting. Staff to review why full consensus requirement was included in the charter. Move this item up on the next agenda. ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
Dear All, Thank you for participating in today's SCI meeting. Please note the action items below. These also are posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/20+February+2013. Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or changes. With best regards, Julie Action Items: SCI Meeting of 20 February 2013 * Termination and Suspension of a PDP — Staff: Change "PDP WG" to "PDP Team"; produce clean version for final review * Re-Submitting a Motion -- Staff: change (1) to requirement to provide a reasoning for the re-submission 8 days prior to the meeting; SCI members: Take the revised text to the Constituencies/SGs for comments. * Charter Revision Drafting Team -- Volunteers: Avri Doria, Angie Graves, James Bladel, J.Scott; Staff: Set up an initial call. * Working Group Survey: Staff -- Resend the summary of the survey; move to the top of the agenda for the 06 March meeting. * Chair/Vice Chair Elections -- Fold this into changes to the entire charter; submit all revisions to the Council at the same time. * GNSO Council Liaison -- The Council will appoint one of the Council members who also is an SCI member.
Thanks Julie - all looks good! Anne [cid:461592422@20022013-198E]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:23 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from SCI Meeting 20 February Dear All, Thank you for participating in today's SCI meeting. Please note the action items below. These also are posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/20+February+2013. Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or changes. With best regards, Julie Action Items: SCI Meeting of 20 February 2013 * Termination and Suspension of a PDP — Staff: Change "PDP WG" to "PDP Team"; produce clean version for final review * Re-Submitting a Motion -- Staff: change (1) to requirement to provide a reasoning for the re-submission 8 days prior to the meeting; SCI members: Take the revised text to the Constituencies/SGs for comments. * Charter Revision Drafting Team -- Volunteers: Avri Doria, Angie Graves, James Bladel, J.Scott; Staff: Set up an initial call. * Working Group Survey: Staff -- Resend the summary of the survey; move to the top of the agenda for the 06 March meeting. * Chair/Vice Chair Elections -- Fold this into changes to the entire charter; submit all revisions to the Council at the same time. * GNSO Council Liaison -- The Council will appoint one of the Council members who also is an SCI member. ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
Thanks for the prompt posting of action items, Julie. One correction: GNSO Council Liaison - The Council will appoint one of the Council members to the SCI. (Neither Jonathan, nor I, discussed who the liaison would be. Jonathan is going to bring this discussion to Council and then revert back to us with the name of the appointee. If you could make that correction and then re-post that would be appreciated. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com> Partners, Inc. _____ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:23 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from SCI Meeting 20 February Dear All, Thank you for participating in today's SCI meeting. Please note the action items below. These also are posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/20+February+2013. Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or changes. With best regards, Julie Action Items: SCI Meeting of 20 February 2013 * Termination and Suspension of a PDP - Staff: Change "PDP WG" to "PDP Team"; produce clean version for final review * Re-Submitting a Motion -- Staff: change (1) to requirement to provide a reasoning for the re-submission 8 days prior to the meeting; SCI members: Take the revised text to the Constituencies/SGs for comments. * Charter Revision Drafting Team -- Volunteers: Avri Doria, Angie Graves, James Bladel, J.Scott; Staff: Set up an initial call. * Working Group Survey: Staff -- Resend the summary of the survey; move to the top of the agenda for the 06 March meeting. * Chair/Vice Chair Elections -- Fold this into changes to the entire charter; submit all revisions to the Council at the same time. * GNSO Council Liaison -- The Council will appoint one of the Council members who also is an SCI member.
Ron, I apologize. I inadvertently captured what I had noted from the discussion on the Council list yesterday, that is, that the current proposal is that one of the SCI members who also was a councilor would have the option of volunteering to be the liaison. However, it is more appropriate to capture what was discussed in the SCI meeting. Here are the revised actions. These also are posted to the wiki. Action Items: SCI Meeting of 20 February 2013 * Termination and Suspension of a PDP — Staff: Change "PDP WG" to "PDP Team"; produce clean version for final review * Re-Submitting a Motion -- Staff: change (1) to requirement to provide a reasoning for the re-submission 8 days prior to the meeting; SCI members: Take the revised text to the Constituencies/SGs for comments. * Charter Revision Drafting Team -- Volunteers: Avri Doria, Angie Graves, James Bladel, J.Scott; Staff: Set up an initial call. * Working Group Survey: Staff -- Resend the summary of the survey; move to the top of the agenda for the 06 March meeting. * Chair/Vice Chair Elections -- Fold this into changes to the entire charter; submit all revisions to the Council at the same time. * GNSO Council Liaison -- The Council will appoint one of the Council members to the SCI. Best regards, Julie From: Ron Andruff <randruff@rnapartners.com<mailto:randruff@rnapartners.com>> Organization: RNA Partners Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:10 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from SCI Meeting 20 February Thanks for the prompt posting of action items, Julie. One correction: GNSO Council Liaison – The Council will appoint one of the Council members to the SCI. (Neither Jonathan, nor I, discussed who the liaison would be. Jonathan is going to bring this discussion to Council and then revert back to us with the name of the appointee. If you could make that correction and then re-post that would be appreciated. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc.<http://www.rnapartners.com> ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:23 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from SCI Meeting 20 February Dear All, Thank you for participating in today's SCI meeting. Please note the action items below. These also are posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/20+February+2013. Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or changes. With best regards, Julie Action Items: SCI Meeting of 20 February 2013 * Termination and Suspension of a PDP — Staff: Change "PDP WG" to "PDP Team"; produce clean version for final review * Re-Submitting a Motion -- Staff: change (1) to requirement to provide a reasoning for the re-submission 8 days prior to the meeting; SCI members: Take the revised text to the Constituencies/SGs for comments. * Charter Revision Drafting Team -- Volunteers: Avri Doria, Angie Graves, James Bladel, J.Scott; Staff: Set up an initial call. * Working Group Survey: Staff -- Resend the summary of the survey; move to the top of the agenda for the 06 March meeting. * Chair/Vice Chair Elections -- Fold this into changes to the entire charter; submit all revisions to the Council at the same time. * GNSO Council Liaison -- The Council will appoint one of the Council members who also is an SCI member.
Thank you Julie. RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com> Partners, Inc. _____ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:21 PM To: Ron Andruff; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from SCI Meeting 20 February Ron, I apologize. I inadvertently captured what I had noted from the discussion on the Council list yesterday, that is, that the current proposal is that one of the SCI members who also was a councilor would have the option of volunteering to be the liaison. However, it is more appropriate to capture what was discussed in the SCI meeting. Here are the revised actions. These also are posted to the wiki. Action Items: SCI Meeting of 20 February 2013 * Termination and Suspension of a PDP - Staff: Change "PDP WG" to "PDP Team"; produce clean version for final review * Re-Submitting a Motion -- Staff: change (1) to requirement to provide a reasoning for the re-submission 8 days prior to the meeting; SCI members: Take the revised text to the Constituencies/SGs for comments. * Charter Revision Drafting Team -- Volunteers: Avri Doria, Angie Graves, James Bladel, J.Scott; Staff: Set up an initial call. * Working Group Survey: Staff -- Resend the summary of the survey; move to the top of the agenda for the 06 March meeting. * Chair/Vice Chair Elections -- Fold this into changes to the entire charter; submit all revisions to the Council at the same time. * GNSO Council Liaison -- The Council will appoint one of the Council members to the SCI. Best regards, Julie From: Ron Andruff <randruff@rnapartners.com> Organization: RNA Partners Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:10 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from SCI Meeting 20 February Thanks for the prompt posting of action items, Julie. One correction: GNSO Council Liaison - The Council will appoint one of the Council members to the SCI. (Neither Jonathan, nor I, discussed who the liaison would be. Jonathan is going to bring this discussion to Council and then revert back to us with the name of the appointee. If you could make that correction and then re-post that would be appreciated. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com> Partners, Inc. _____ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:23 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from SCI Meeting 20 February Dear All, Thank you for participating in today's SCI meeting. Please note the action items below. These also are posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/20+February+2013. Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or changes. With best regards, Julie Action Items: SCI Meeting of 20 February 2013 * Termination and Suspension of a PDP - Staff: Change "PDP WG" to "PDP Team"; produce clean version for final review * Re-Submitting a Motion -- Staff: change (1) to requirement to provide a reasoning for the re-submission 8 days prior to the meeting; SCI members: Take the revised text to the Constituencies/SGs for comments. * Charter Revision Drafting Team -- Volunteers: Avri Doria, Angie Graves, James Bladel, J.Scott; Staff: Set up an initial call. * Working Group Survey: Staff -- Resend the summary of the survey; move to the top of the agenda for the 06 March meeting. * Chair/Vice Chair Elections -- Fold this into changes to the entire charter; submit all revisions to the Council at the same time. * GNSO Council Liaison -- The Council will appoint one of the Council members who also is an SCI member.
I’ll volunteer for the Charter Revision Drafting Team, too. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:22 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Action items from SCI Meeting 20 February Dear All, Thank you for participating in today's SCI meeting. Please note the action items below. These also are posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/20+February+2013. Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or changes. With best regards, Julie Action Items: SCI Meeting of 20 February 2013 a.. Termination and Suspension of a PDP — Staff: Change "PDP WG" to "PDP Team"; produce clean version for final review b.. Re-Submitting a Motion -- Staff: change (1) to requirement to provide a reasoning for the re-submission 8 days prior to the meeting; SCI members: Take the revised text to the Constituencies/SGs for comments. c.. Charter Revision Drafting Team -- Volunteers: Avri Doria, Angie Graves, James Bladel, J.Scott; Staff: Set up an initial call. d.. Working Group Survey: Staff -- Resend the summary of the survey; move to the top of the agenda for the 06 March meeting. e.. Chair/Vice Chair Elections -- Fold this into changes to the entire charter; submit all revisions to the Council at the same time. f.. GNSO Council Liaison -- The Council will appoint one of the Council members who also is an SCI member.
Dear SCI members, Please note the action items below from today's meeting. These also are posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/06+March+2013<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/20+February+2013>. Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or changes. With best regards, Julie Action Items: SCI Meeting of 06 March 2013 * Termination and Suspension of a PDP — Staff: Submit for Public Comment * Working Group Guidelines Survey -- Staff: 1) Gather the comments as examples for Ron Andruff to provide to the Council in Beijing as part of the the update on SCI activities; 2) Provide to the list a draft note for Ron Andruff to send to selected Working Groups to request that they take the survey, along with a list of suggested Working Groups * Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; Staff: Put at the top of the agenda for the next meeting * Charter Revision Drafting Team -- The Drafting Team is taking a look at the charter and proposing a bullet-point list of suggested areas of revision; next meeting is 14 March at 2000 UTC/1300 PDT/1600 EDT
Dear SCI members, This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows: -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; Staff: Put at the top of the agenda for the next meeting The options for review are listed below. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion: 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order): 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission.
Dear SCI members, This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows: 1. Re-submitting a motion: ISPC, BC, NCUC are supportive thus far of the suggested way forward if 1 (leave up to discretion of the chair) is removed; awaiting responses from other groups. The options for review are listed below. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion: 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order): 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission.
Dear SCI members, This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows: -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion: 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order): 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission.
Hello SCI Team: Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this issue. We can report that RrSG members strongly favor Option #2. Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except- for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are followed. Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may be re-introduced. We look forward to further discussions on our next call. Thanks-- J. From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45 To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Dear SCI members, This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows: -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion: 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order): 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission.
Hi, Good point about adding a rate limiting or repeat count requirement. avri On 26 May 2013, at 03:51, James M. Bladel wrote:
Hello SCI Team:
Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this issue. We can report that RrSG members strongly favor Option #2.
Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except- for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are followed. Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may be re-introduced.
We look forward to further discussions on our next call.
Thanks--
J. From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45 To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion
Dear SCI members,
This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows:
-- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies.
It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria.
Best regards, Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion:
1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair
2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order):
1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission.
Thank you James and Jennifer for the quick turnaround on this matter. As I understand it, the request for re-submitting a motion had never happened before the first occasion, which brought it to our table, but I agree that it would be for the Committee to discuss the idea of frequency to make sure we are all of like mind as to what this would mean. By way of this mail, I am asking Julie to be sure to include this in our next meeting. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com> Partners, Inc. _____ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 9:51 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Cc: Jennifer Standiford Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Importance: High Hello SCI Team: Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this issue. We can report that RrSG members strongly favor Option #2. Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except- for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are followed. Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may be re-introduced. We look forward to further discussions on our next call. Thanks-- J. From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45 To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Dear SCI members, This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows: -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion: 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order): 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission.
Thanks Ron. I can confirm that re-submitting a motion is an item on our agenda for our next meeting, which we are planning using a Doodle poll. Best regards, Julie From: Ron Andruff <randruff@rnapartners.com> Organization: RNA Partners Date: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:48 AM To: James Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford' <JStandiford@web.com> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Thank you James and Jennifer for the quick turnaround on this matter. As I understand it, the request for re-submitting a motion had never happened before the first occasion, which brought it to our table, but I agree that it would be for the Committee to discuss the idea of frequency to make sure we are all of like mind as to what this would mean. By way of this mail, I am asking Julie to be sure to include this in our next meeting. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc. <http://www.rnapartners.com> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 9:51 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Cc: Jennifer Standiford Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Importance: High Hello SCI Team: Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this issue. We can report that RrSG members strongly favor Option #2. Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except- for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are followed. Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may be re-introduced. We look forward to further discussions on our next call. Thanks-- J. From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45 To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Dear SCI members, This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows: -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion: 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order): 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission.
Ron, I had wanted to report to SCI that in its full meeting in Beijing, the IPC agreed to the first two criteria listed in Item 2 of the "one or more high level criteria" to be set for resubmitting a motion. Anne [cid:548334018@29052013-21FF]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:49 AM To: 'James M. Bladel'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford' Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Thank you James and Jennifer for the quick turnaround on this matter. As I understand it, the request for re-submitting a motion had never happened before the first occasion, which brought it to our table, but I agree that it would be for the Committee to discuss the idea of frequency to make sure we are all of like mind as to what this would mean. By way of this mail, I am asking Julie to be sure to include this in our next meeting. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc.<http://www.rnapartners.com> ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 9:51 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Cc: Jennifer Standiford Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Importance: High Hello SCI Team: Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this issue. We can report that RrSG members strongly favor Option #2. Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except- for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are followed. Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may be re-introduced. We look forward to further discussions on our next call. Thanks-- J. From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45 To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Dear SCI members, This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows: -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion: 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order): 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission. ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
Thank you, Anne. We will take this up on our call this coming Tuesday. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com> Partners, Inc. _____ From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:43 PM To: 'Ron Andruff'; 'James M. Bladel'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford' Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March Re-Submitting a Motion Ron, I had wanted to report to SCI that in its full meeting in Beijing, the IPC agreed to the first two criteria listed in Item 2 of the "one or more high level criteria" to be set for resubmitting a motion. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP . Suite 700 One South Church Avenue . Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 . Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com . www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. _____ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:49 AM To: 'James M. Bladel'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford' Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Thank you James and Jennifer for the quick turnaround on this matter. As I understand it, the request for re-submitting a motion had never happened before the first occasion, which brought it to our table, but I agree that it would be for the Committee to discuss the idea of frequency to make sure we are all of like mind as to what this would mean. By way of this mail, I am asking Julie to be sure to include this in our next meeting. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com> Partners, Inc. _____ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 9:51 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Cc: Jennifer Standiford Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Importance: High Hello SCI Team: Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this issue. We can report that RrSG members strongly favor Option #2. Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except- for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are followed. Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may be re-introduced. We look forward to further discussions on our next call. Thanks-- J. From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45 To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion Dear SCI members, This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action item is as follows: -- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion: 1. Leave up to discretion of the Chair 2. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order): 1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting. 3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda. 4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the re-submission. _____ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to <http://www.lewisandroca.com/> www.lewisandroca.com. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
participants (7)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Avri Doria -
James M. Bladel -
Julie Hedlund -
Marika Konings -
Ron Andruff -
WUKnoben