Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members, The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/. The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach. Thank you very much. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Thanks Julie. Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Dear SCI members, The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/. The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach. Thank you very much. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
I agree with Wolf-Ulrich. j. scott evans - head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@yahoo.com ________________________________ From: "KnobenW@telekom.de" <KnobenW@telekom.de> To: julie.hedlund@icann.org; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:03 PM Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Thanks Julie. Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________ Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members,
The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
All, I see that my message was not clear. I wasn't asking whether we should extend beyond August 20th, just that unless there were objections we would continue through the end of the reply comment period, which ends on 20 August, rather than canceling the reply comment period. I hope this is clearer and I apologize for the confusion. Best regards, Julie From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@yahoo.com<mailto:jscottevans@yahoo.com>> Reply-To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@yahoo.com<mailto:jscottevans@yahoo.com>> Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 11:11 AM To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de>>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures I agree with Wolf-Ulrich. j. scott evans - head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@yahoo.com<mailto:jscottevans@yahoo.com> ________________________________ From: "KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de>" <KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de>> To: julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:03 PM Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Thanks Julie. Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Dear SCI members, The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/. The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach. Thank you very much. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Hi, Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates. avri On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:
Thanks Julie.
Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual.
Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members,
The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Apologies for my ignorance, but can someone clarify which issue was out for public comment? As for the time frames, I agree with Avri and Wolf-Ulrich that there is no reason to change the normal process. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:54 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Hi, Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates. avri On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:
Thanks Julie.
Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual.
Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members,
The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Ron, The changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures (consent agenda and voting thresholds table) were out for public comment. Here's the link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-operating-procedures-2012- 09jul12-en.htm. Thanks so much, Julie On 8/1/12 5:59 PM, "Ron Andruff" <randruff@rnapartners.com> wrote:
Apologies for my ignorance, but can someone clarify which issue was out for public comment?
As for the time frames, I agree with Avri and Wolf-Ulrich that there is no reason to change the normal process.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:54 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Hi,
Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates.
avri
On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:
Thanks Julie.
Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual.
Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members,
The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Thank you. RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:15 PM To: Ron Andruff; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Ron, The changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures (consent agenda and voting thresholds table) were out for public comment. Here's the link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-operating-procedures-2012- 09jul12-en.htm. Thanks so much, Julie On 8/1/12 5:59 PM, "Ron Andruff" <randruff@rnapartners.com> wrote:
Apologies for my ignorance, but can someone clarify which issue was out for public comment?
As for the time frames, I agree with Avri and Wolf-Ulrich that there is no reason to change the normal process.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:54 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Hi,
Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates.
avri
On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:
Thanks Julie.
Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual.
Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members,
The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
I generally dislike the "+1" "reply-all" email but in this case, and for record-keeping purposes, I guess it's justified, so ... +1 (agree with Wolf-Ulrich, Avri, Ron et al). Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@rnapartners.com> To:"'Avri Doria'" <avri@acm.org>, <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Date: 8/1/2012 6:01 PM Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Apologies for my ignorance, but can someone clarify which issue was out for public comment? As for the time frames, I agree with Avri and Wolf-Ulrich that there is no reason to change the normal process. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:54 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Hi, Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates. avri On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:
Thanks Julie.
Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual.
Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members,
The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
participants (6)
-
Avri Doria -
J. Scott Evans -
Julie Hedlund -
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Mary.Wong＠law.unh.edu -
Ron Andruff