Apologies for my ignorance, but can someone clarify which issue was out for public comment? As for the time frames, I agree with Avri and Wolf-Ulrich that there is no reason to change the normal process. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:54 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures Hi, Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates. avri On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:
Thanks Julie.
Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual.
Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members,
The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director