bah… this time with a file attached. sorry about that. mikey On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:29 AM, James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com> wrote:
Excellent work, Lars. We are very close!
Some edits attached.
Thanks—
J.
From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 at 5:30 To: "gnso-irtpd@icann.org" <gnso-irtpd@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Updated Draft Initial Report
Dear all,
Following yesterday's call, please find attached an updated version of the Draft Initial Report.
Editing changes were made to Questions B and D. The rationale for question B was extended (re: extension of the statute of limitations)
In addition, I noted for Questions C and D that the WG would like to solicit public comment especially on the issues of: the potential need to refund consts to registrars if/when transfers are negated/reversed (Question B) The potential need to define 'invalid transfers (Question B) The potential abolition of the registry layer (Question C) I would like to encourage WG members strongly to share any concerns/edits on the list as the submission deadline for Singapore is next Monday 3 March 2014.
Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
<IRTP-DInitial Report_V5 - JMB EDITS.doc>
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)