Hi Tapani, thank you very much for the additional analysis and for providing the info a few days before our next call. So everybody has the chance to look at this and we can discuss it during Wednesday's call. I would like everybody to read and think about Tapani's arguments. If understood this correctly, it mainly is about whether diacritics are only those characters, which are decomposable into an ASCII character and one or more diacritics (i.e., Combining Diacritical Marks https://www.unicode.org/charts/nameslist/n_0300.html)? Or whether characters that are not decomposable, but still have a name like: "LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH STROKE" which denotes a composition of ASCII and something else should be considered as diacritics? Talk you to you all on Wednesday, Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Deutschland Dipl.-Informatiker Tel: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software-Entwicklung E-Mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Registereintrag: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Geschäftsführer: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp Zertifiziert nach DIN ISO/IEC 27001:2017