Hi All I had intended to ask this question on today's call, but as that didn't happen I'll ask on the list. It is possible that my question is out of scope of the DG, but I'd be interested in the thoughts of others. Given the potential for substantive changes to be made to the New gTLD Program as a result of the work of the DG and other reviews that are being undertaken, will any consideration be given to the disparity that may result between registry operators from this round and future rounds? I raise this question mostly in the context of the Registry Agreement. I would envisage a number of challenges in terms of compliance and for ICANN more generally in managing clients on different platforms in the event of a significantly revised Registry Agreement. This issue may have already been discussed by this group and I apologise if I missed it, but I would welcome thoughts of others about whether they foresee any problems or how this meta issue will be addressed in the reviews and other work moving forward. Thanks, Donna [Description: Description: Description: ARI Logo]DONNA AUSTIN Policy and Industry Affairs Manager ARI REGISTRY SERVICES Melbourne | Los Angeles P +1 310 890 9655 P +61 3 9866 3710 E donna.austin@ariservices.com<mailto:donna.austin@ariservices.com> W www.ariservices.com<http://www.ariservices.com/> Follow us on Twitter<https://twitter.com/ARIservices> The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.
