Cheryl and Rubens, There were consistent references to “rough consensus” in the discussion during this meeting. In addition, there were several changes to the slides which were recommended and agreed. These changes do not appear in the slides at this time. When may we expect them? Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D3735E.5754ED60] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rubensk@nic.br] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 3:44 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] Registry Services straw-person On 4 Dec 2017, at 19:40, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> wrote: Hi all, Were the revised slides from last Thursday's call relative to "rough consensus" sent out? Slides and recording are available at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2017-11-30+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Pro... But the call was a recap, not a consensus call on any WT4 topics... Rubens ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
