Dear Work Track 5 members, Please see below the action items and notes from the Work Track 5 meeting today, 15 May 2019. These high-level notes are designed to help WT5 members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute for the recording, transcript, or the chat, which will be posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-05-15+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Pro.... Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Notes and Action Items: Actions: Staff to go back through the tabs and make sure any BRG/RrSG mis-assignments are fixed Notes: 1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): Annebeth has changed her work title, but will still be on WT5 doing the same work. 2. Review of Public Comments: Names requiring government support/non- objections from the 2012 AGB (see deliberations section f.2.3.2 for context) Question 19, Variant 2: Line 40 -- ALAC -- Agreement/Divergence Lines 41-54: Divergence Question 19, Variant 3: Line 56 -- Dotzon GmbH -- Agreement Line 57 -- ALAC -- Agreement/Divergence Lines 58-70: Divergence Question 20: Lines 72-78: Agreement Line 79 -- United States -- Agreement/Concerns Line 80 -- RySG -- Agreement/Divergence Lines 81-89: Divergence Question 21: Lines 91-98: Agreement Line 99 -- Agreement/Divergence Line 100 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 101-108: Divergence Question 22: Lines 110-113: Agreement Line 114 -- ALAC -- Agreement/Divergence Lines 115-125: Divergence Lines 126-7: No comment Question 23: Lines 129-134: Agreement Line 135 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 136-146: Divergence Question 24: Lines 148-154: Agreement Line 155 -- ALAC -- Agreement/Divergence Lines 156-165: Divergence Question 25: Lines 167-169: Agreement Line 170 -- dotBerlin et al. -- Agreement (partially -- first part) Line 171 -- Dotzon GmbH -- Agreement (partially - second part) Divergence (with first part) Line 172 -- IPC -- Agreement (partially - first part) Divergence (with second part) Line 173 -- ALAC -- Agreement/Divergence Line 174 -- RyST -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 175-183: Divergence Question 26: Lines 185-198: Agreement Lines 199-201: Divergence Names requiring government support/non- objections from the 2012 AGB (see deliberations section f2.3.3 for context) Question 27: Lines 6-13: Agreement Line 14 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 15-23: Divergence Question 28: Lines 25-27: Agreement Line 28 -- BRG -- Agreement (qualified) Line 29 -- IPC -- Agreement/Divergence Line 30 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 31-42: Divergence Question 29: Line 44 -- BRG -- Agreement (qualified) Lines 45-49: Agreement Line 50 -- Group of Registries -- Agreement (qualified) Line 51 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 52-61: Divergence Names requiring government support/non- objections from the 2012 AGB (see deliberations section f.2.3.4 for context) Question 30: Lines 6-13: Agreement Line 14 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 15-23: Divergence Question 31: Lines 25-26: Agreement (qualified) Lines 27-28: Agreement Line 29 -- IPC -- Change to Divergence Line 30 -- RyST -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 31-42: Divergence Question 32: Lines 44-50: Agreement (some qualified) Line 51 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified)/Divergence Lines 52-61: Divergence Options/Proposals: terms not included in the 2012 Applicant Guidebook (see deliberations section f.2.4 for context) Line 4 -- Christopher Wilkinson -- Concerns Question 33: Lines 5-14: Agreement (some qualified) Line 15 -- ALAC -- Change to Divergence Lines 16-22: Divergence Lines 23 - RySG -- Doesn’t appear to address the proposal Question 34: Lines 25-30: Agreement Line 31 -- DotBERLIN -- Agreement/Concerns Line 32 -- dotzon GmbH -- Agreement Lines 33 -- RySG -- Agreement/Concerns/Divergence Line 34-35: Concerns/Divergence Lines 36-40: Divergence Line 41 -- Portuguese Govt. Question 35: Lines 43-49: Agreement Lines 50-51: Concerns/Divergence Lines 52-59: Divergence Line 60 -- RySG. -- no position Question 36: Lines 62-71: Agreement (IPC line 72 is qualified) Line 72 -- NCSG -- Agreement/Concerns -- change to Agreement, qualified Line 73 -- RrSG -- Concerns/Divergence -- This is really divergence with explanation Lines 74-77: Divergence Line 78 -- RySG -- no position * There are a few cases where a group has given the rationale has been given followed by divergence. Sometimes it is categorized as concerns followed by divergence, but perhaps it should just be divergence with a rationale provided. There are a number of cases on tab F 2.4). Comments from BRG (line 50) and RrSG (line 51) may have this problem. Lines 34 (suggestion to change to divergence) and 35 are also cited. * Staff will pull out these items for the summary document regardless, the highlighting helps staff condense the material. It is not a problem from staff perspective to change these to divergence if the group prefers. Question 37: Lines 80-86: Agreement Line 87 -- ALAC -- Agreement/Concerns - should be Agreement (Qualified) + Concerns Lines 88-96: Divergence Line 97 -- RySG -- no position Question 38: Lines 99-107: Agreement Lines 108-115: Divergence Line 116 -- RySG -- no position AOB * Leadership Team is thinking about how to use the time at ICANN65 * There will likely be two sessions on the first day * Feedback is welcome on the agenda for these sessions * The time may be used to summarize points of agreement and focus on difficult issues * Additional substantive comment from one member -- geographic names must be protected for future generations. This protection should not be limited to specific lists.