Dear Jeff Dear Steve, Thanks for the helpful tracks Reagrds Kavouss 2016-04-04 0:52 GMT+02:00 Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>:
Dear Kavouss,
To add to what Jeff mentioned, here is a bit of additional detail/context that you will hopefully find useful.
The subjects that are contained in the Charter ( http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-charter-21ja...) and the Final Issue Report ( http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-final-issue-...), stem from the work of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Discussion Group ( http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/inactive/2015/non-pdp-new-gtld) that preceded this PDP, which reflected upon the experiences from the 2012 round of the New gTLD Program to identify subjects for future possible policy development. The Final Issue Report seeks to provide additional detail and analysis around these subjects, which could be considered the "difficulties, shorthcoming, deficiencies and problems encountered” from the community’s perspective. Jeff already provided the link to the ICANN staff developed New gTLD Program Reviews, which I think directly answers your question.
In regards to contacting the GAC, outreach to the SO/ACs is a required step in the policy development process. The PDP WG will need to collectively work together to establish a set of questions to pose to the SO/ACs and it has been preliminarily agreed to by the WG that more than one set of questions (based on the Tracks) is likely to be needed during these outreach efforts.
Geographic names are discussed in Section 4.3.1: Reserved Names of the Final Issue Report linked above.
Best, Steve
From: Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 1:59 PM To: Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com> Cc: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" < gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Proposed Agenda for 4 April 2016
Dear Jeff Thank you very much for the advice One of the head ache that we have had and still having in the GAC is Geographic Name We have also another head ache which is Geographic Identification WHERE THESE THINGS ARE ADDRESSED Regards Kavouss
2016-04-03 22:57 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>:
Dear Jeff Thank you very much for the advice One of the head ack
2016-04-03 21:02 GMT+02:00 Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>:
Dear Kavouss,
We have noted all of those great suggestions from the previous call and have them as action items. Many of them relate to Track 3 which we will address at a later point when we split up into different subteams to work on the different tracks. I would also like to remind the Working Group to review the ICANN Final Implementation Report at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/program-review-29jan16-en.pdf. That may address some of the topics you reference below.
On our next call, the plan is to review the 2007 high level principles, make sure we think they are still relevant (or whether they need some changes) and see if there are any high level overall principles we should be coming up with to govern the introduction of subsequent TLDs. Then, time permitting, we will go into the first one or two overall questions.
I hope that helps.
Best regards,
*Jeffrey J. Neuman*
*Senior Vice President *|*Valideus USA*| *Com Laude USA*
1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
Mclean, VA 22102, United States
E: jeff.neuman@valideus.com or jeff.neuman@comlaude.com
T: +1.703.635.7514
M: +1.202.549.5079
@Jintlaw
*From:*gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kavouss Arasteh via Gnso-newgtld-wg *Sent:* Saturday, April 2, 2016 3:21 AM *To:* Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> *Cc:* gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Proposed Agenda for 4 April 2016
Dear Steve,
Thank you very much for the message
At the last meeting of the Group,I raised the need to receive a report from ICANN on difficuilties, shorthcoming, defficiencies and problems encountred in implementing the first gTLD rould.
I also implicitly suggested that SOs/ACs , in particular, GAC be formally asked to make a list of the above mentioned issues (difficuilties, shorthcoming, defficiencies and problems encountred in implementing the first gTLD rould) and any proposed remedial actions
Moreover, I did suggest that a list of identical strings, and singular, plural strings and issue of different meaning of a string in different lanuages ,the issue of Autions, advantages and disadvantages be also addressed.
May you pls advise on these also
Tks
Kavouss .
2016-04-01 20:41 GMT+02:00 Steve Chan via Gnso-newgtld-wg < gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>:
Dear WG Members,
Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday 4 April 2016 at 22:00 UTC.
1. Review agenda 2. Roll Call/SoIs 3. Discussion on response to Dr. Crocker (Draft letter to be distributed by Steve Coates) 4. Discussion regarding principles from 2007 Final Report (excerpt attached) 5. Discussion on Subject 1: Should there in fact be new gTLDs? 6. Discussion on Subject 2 (Time Permitting): TLD Types/Differentiation 7. AOB
Best,
Steve
*Steven Chan* Sr. Policy Manager
*ICANN*12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org
direct: +1.310.301.3886 mobile: +1.310.339.4410
tel: +1.310.301.5800
fax: +1.310.823.8649
_______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg