All, After sending the doc to Steve I realized my calculation of the IO’s success percentage was incorrect. The correct percentage is 10.52%. K From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2016 6:11 PM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Independent Objector Statistics Dear WG Members, During the WG’s face-to-face, Kristina Rosette mentioned that she had some statistics related to the objections raised by the Independent Objector, as well as the respective outcomes. I asked if she was willing to share with the full WG and she graciously agreed. As such, please find those statistics attached. Not to take away from the discussion related to the Independent Objector, but I would like to point out that there are statistics for of the objection grounds here: https://community.icann.org/x/Vz2AAw. This analysis was shared with work track 3, so some on the full WG may not have had an opportunity to see. Best, Steve Steven Chan Sr. Policy Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> direct: +1.310.301.3886 mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/