Hi Jeff, Re your message below to the Sub Pro list about the IETF draft proposal that "there should be strings that are reserved at the top level to allow entities to create private internets", I'm pasting the ICANN Mission provisions below which you referenced in your NCAP post. It strikes me that the IETF is an "Internet protocol standards development organization", so I'm unsure as to why you object to the initiation of an IETF process on this issue. I think your position is that this proposed IETF standard "has no particular technical purpose"? Is that the essence of what you are saying? Anne Section 1.1(a)(i): ICANN "Coordinates the allocation and assignment of names in the root zone of the Domain Name System ("DNS")".. Section 1.1(a)(iv): ICANN "Collaborates with other bodies as appropriate to provide registries needed for the functioning of the Internet as specified by Internet protocol standards development organizations." From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 6:57 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Informational RFC to create Private Namespace TLDs [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ All, I thought I would forward this new Informational RFC put out by two employees working in ICANN's OCTO group. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arends-private-use-tld/?include_text=... This proposed informational draft is not as technical as most of them. In fact, I would argue that although this has been filed to be dealt with at the IETF level, it really should be dealt with within ICANN's Multi-stakeholder processes as opposed to the IETF. It relates to a topic we have discussed before - Special Use Domains. In this draft, the authors argue that there should be strings that are reserved at the top level to allow entities to create private internets. There are a bunch of reasons to do this and some of them are articulated in the draft. I am not commenting on the merits of the RFC and not making an argument for or against. However, this is the type of thing I would think that the ICANN Community should have the ability to influence as opposed to circumventing the ICANN multi-stakeholder processes by going to the IETF to get these reserved as "special use" domains. Remember, we are recommending that Special Use domains that go through the IETF should be accounted for by being reserved from delegation by ICANN. Previously special use domains that were reserved had a particular technical purpose, but this one doesn't seem to fall into that category. Although we have completed our section on Special Use domains, I wanted to bring this to everyone's attention in case they had some thoughts. Jeff Neuman Senior Vice President Com Laude | Valideus 1751 Pinnacle Drive Suite 600, McLean VA 22102, USA M: +1.202.549.5079 D: +1.703.635.7514 E: jeff.neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com> www.comlaude.com<http://www.comlaude.com/> [cid:image002.jpg@01D64319.00333E50] ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that the Com Laude Group does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 06181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176, having its registered office at 33 Melville Street, Edinburgh, Lothian, EH3 7JF Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, headquartered at 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600, McLean, VA 22102, USA; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan having its registered office at Suite 319,1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan. For further information see www.comlaude.com<https://comlaude.com> ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
