Anne, That language comes directly from Specification 11 of the registry agreements, which reads: "Registry Operator will operate the registry for the TLD in compliance with all commitments, statements of intent and business plans stated in the following sections of Registry Operator’s application to ICANN for the TLD, which commitments, statements of intent and business plans are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement." Spec 11 was added to address GAC Advice, but I get your point that it's uncertain whether those specific provisions were added because of GAC positions, because of other stakeholders, or by ICANN's own creativity. My recollection, not backed by transcripts though, is that this topic was first raised by CSG constituencies, but later mentioned in GAC sessions. So while I do not see a bias, attribution chain is indeed not that solid. Rubens
On 11 Jun 2018, at 20:02, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:
Regarding Section 1.3.2(b) of Foundational Issues, the following draft from the Initial Report seems a bit biased to me, especially as to the paraphrasing of the GAC Advice in the highlighted language:
In October 2012, the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) provided advice to the ICANN Board of Directors of ICANN that it should come up with a mechanism to incorporate certain commitments, business plans, registration restrictions, additional rights protection mechanisms and other objectives in the Base Registry Agreement such that they could be overseen by ICANN’s compliance department. In response to the GAC, the New gTLD Program Committee of the Board proposed a new Specification 11 to the Base Registry Agreement to transform application statements into binding contractual commitments,
I believe the focus of the GAC Advice was consumer protection - not approval of business plans and adding RPMs as stated in the draft. The actual GAC Advice with respect to Category 1 Safeguards was as follows:
<image001.png>
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com _____________________________ <image004.png> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com
From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Friday, June 08, 2018 3:10 PM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 12 June 2018 at 03:00 UTC
Dear WG Members,
Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for 12 June 2018 at 03:00 UTC, for 90 minutes.
• Agenda Review • Roll Call/SOIs • Review of the Initial Report (continued). * The purpose of this review is to ensure that preliminary outcomes and deliberations are accurately captured and written in an understandable manner. The WG Co-Chairs have sought to make clear that this exercise is not intended to re-open substantive discussions, which is better served by the submission of public comments and subsequently when reviewing public comments received. Please submit your comments about these sections to the Working Group mailing list (gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org) in advance of the meeting. • Continue and Complete Section 1.7 (Name Collisions) • Begin Review of Section 1.3 (Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice; Global Public Interest; Applicant Freedom of Expression; Universal Acceptance) • Time Permitting, Begin Review of Section 1.8 (Objections; Accountability Mechanisms) • AOB
For Item 3, the relevant documents are attached. As a reminder, please note that a resource page has been set up on the Wiki to track the distribution of Initial Report sections, which you can find here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. As you can see in the link, the following sections have been released:
1.2: Overarching Issues 1.3: Foundational Issues 1.4: Pre-Launch Activities 1.5: Application Submission 1.6: Application Processing 1.7: Application Evaluation/Criteria 1.8: Dispute Proceedings 1.10: Contracting 1.11: Pre-Delegation 1.12: Post-Delegation
Those signed up as Members to this PDP WG should have received meeting information from the SOAC Support team. If you did not receive these participation details or if you would like to send your apologies, please contact the SOAC Support team (gnso-secs@icann.org).
Best, Steve
Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support
ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg