Yes. [cid:image001.png@01D69806.92187370] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Jim Prendergast Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 3:05 PM To: alexander@schubert.berlin Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: ICANN Org SubPro comments Jeff could you clarify Is ICANN pulling together a digest of comments for people to read that is less migraine inducing than that google spreadsheet? That was impossible to decipher. On Oct 1, 2020, at 9:55 AM, Alexander Schubert <alexander@schubert.berlin<mailto:alexander@schubert.berlin>> wrote: Hi, ICANN Org states: ICANN org seeks clarity on whether the PDP WG intends for the maintenance of the 2012 AGB provisions contained in section 2.2.1.4.2. as a policy or if this is intended to be a Recommendation to maintain the implementation effort that was done through the AGB. If the later, can the PDP WG provide additional guidance on some issues that arose during the 2012 round, such as understanding the definition of "relevant governments or public authorities" (at city, state, country and continent level) and the impact that geopolitical changes within a region might have on what qualifies as the "relevant governments or public authorities" during the application processing period? Will the applicant be required to provide new documents of support or non-objection from new "relevant governments or public authorities"? My gut feeling is that most geo names will be city names. I called several times for a support letter tailor-made for city governments. When should that happen? Is that Staff (implementation) action or WG action? If I provide the current letter to a U.S. mayor: their eyes will bulge. The current draft letter is absolutely not suitable for city strings. Thanks, Alexander From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Karen Lentz Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2020 03:21 To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: ICANN Org SubPro comments Dear all, Forwarding for your information the input from ICANN org to the draft Final Report. We have also submitted this for addition into the comment tool being used for this comment forum. Best regards, Karen From: Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 5:10 PM To: "jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com>" <jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com>>, "langdonorr@gmail.com<mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com>" <langdonorr@gmail.com<mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com>> Cc: Goran Marby <goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>, Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org<mailto:karen.lentz@icann.org>>, David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> Subject: ICANN Org SubPro comments Dear Cheryl and Jeff, Please find the attached letter and submission from ICANN org regarding the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Working Group Draft final report. I hope you and your families are well. Kind regards, Theresa _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
