Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 7 May 2018 at 20:00 UTC
Dear WG Members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday 7 May 2018 at 20:00 UTC, for 90 minutes. Agenda Review Roll Call/SOIs Where are we now with the Initial Report? Review of the Initial Report (continued). Section 1.5: Application Submission (Application Fees; Variable Fees; Application Submission Period; Applicant Support; Terms & Conditions) Section 1.6: Application Processing (Application Queuing) AOB For Item 4, all relevant documents were already shared but are again attached again for your convenience. As a reminder, please note that a resource page has been set up on the Wiki to track the distribution of Initial Report sections, which you can find here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. Those signed up as Members to this PDP WG should have received meeting information from the SOAC Support team. If you did not receive these participation details or if you would like to send your apologies, please contact the SOAC Support team (gnso-secs@icann.org). Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
Jeff, Cheryl et al, Regarding 1.5 – I have an edit that should be universal where applicable to our current protocol for comments on the call versus public comments (as commented on the call): 1. What are the preliminary recommendations and/or implementation guidelines? Though the Working Group (this should say Work Track 1 instead of Working Group) discussed a number of different possible alternative approaches, there was no agreement on any alternatives to the 2012; namely that all applications should incur the same base application fee amount regardless of the type of application or the number of applications that the same applicant submits.[1] This would not preclude the possibility of additional fees in certain circumstances (e.g., objections, Registry Service Evaluation Process, etc.). An additional Question for Public Comment should be added to this section which is implied by this preliminary recommendation: Should additional fees be added for certain aspects of application processing? For example, should additional fees apply when objections are made or when an application proposes new services that require a Registry Service Evaluation Process? Should additional fees apply where more than one application is received for the same string and an auction process becomes necessary? Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D3E611.AD770F90] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 10:30 AM To: Rosette, Kristina via Gnso-newgtld-wg Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 7 May 2018 at 20:00 UTC Dear WG Members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday 7 May 2018 at 20:00 UTC, for 90 minutes. 1. Agenda Review 2. Roll Call/SOIs 3. Where are we now with the Initial Report? 4. Review of the Initial Report (continued). * Section 1.5: Application Submission (Application Fees; Variable Fees; Application Submission Period; Applicant Support; Terms & Conditions) * Section 1.6: Application Processing (Application Queuing) 5. AOB For Item 4, all relevant documents were already shared but are again attached again for your convenience. As a reminder, please note that a resource page has been set up on the Wiki to track the distribution of Initial Report sections, which you can find here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. Those signed up as Members to this PDP WG should have received meeting information from the SOAC Support team. If you did not receive these participation details or if you would like to send your apologies, please contact the SOAC Support team (gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>). Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ ________________________________ [1] It should be noted that although some applicants may receive applicant support in the form of reductions of their application fees, those are not considered “Variable Fees” for the purpose of this Initial Report. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Thanks Anne. The comment about using Work Tracks is a great one and we will make sure to apply those changes globally for the sections not yet released and for the next round for those that have been released to the full working group already. Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600 Mclean, VA 22102, United States E: jeff.neuman@valideus.com<mailto:jeff.neuman@valideus.com> or jeff.neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com> T: +1.703.635.7514 M: +1.202.549.5079 @Jintlaw From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 5:43 PM To: 'Steve Chan' <steve.chan@icann.org>; Rosette, Kristina via Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Cc: Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>; Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com>; 'gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org' <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: RE: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 7 May 2018 at 20:00 UTC Jeff, Cheryl et al, Regarding 1.5 – I have an edit that should be universal where applicable to our current protocol for comments on the call versus public comments (as commented on the call): 1. What are the preliminary recommendations and/or implementation guidelines? Though the Working Group (this should say Work Track 1 instead of Working Group) discussed a number of different possible alternative approaches, there was no agreement on any alternatives to the 2012; namely that all applications should incur the same base application fee amount regardless of the type of application or the number of applications that the same applicant submits.[1] This would not preclude the possibility of additional fees in certain circumstances (e.g., objections, Registry Service Evaluation Process, etc.). An additional Question for Public Comment should be added to this section which is implied by this preliminary recommendation: Should additional fees be added for certain aspects of application processing? For example, should additional fees apply when objections are made or when an application proposes new services that require a Registry Service Evaluation Process? Should additional fees apply where more than one application is received for the same string and an auction process becomes necessary? Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image001.png@01D3E642.0B154650] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 10:30 AM To: Rosette, Kristina via Gnso-newgtld-wg Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 7 May 2018 at 20:00 UTC Dear WG Members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday 7 May 2018 at 20:00 UTC, for 90 minutes. 1. Agenda Review 2. Roll Call/SOIs 3. Where are we now with the Initial Report? 4. Review of the Initial Report (continued). * Section 1.5: Application Submission (Application Fees; Variable Fees; Application Submission Period; Applicant Support; Terms & Conditions) * Section 1.6: Application Processing (Application Queuing) 5. AOB For Item 4, all relevant documents were already shared but are again attached again for your convenience. As a reminder, please note that a resource page has been set up on the Wiki to track the distribution of Initial Report sections, which you can find here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. Those signed up as Members to this PDP WG should have received meeting information from the SOAC Support team. If you did not receive these participation details or if you would like to send your apologies, please contact the SOAC Support team (gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>). Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ ________________________________ ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ [1] It should be noted that although some applicants may receive applicant support in the form of reductions of their application fees, those are not considered “Variable Fees” for the purpose of this Initial Report.
participants (3)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Jeff Neuman -
Steve Chan