Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Tuesday, 04 August at 03:00 UTC for 90 Minutes
Dear WG Members, In respect of agenda item 4, please find the link for Model 6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qdNbLO1-EfXdQosA7fK1ugQtaaMzwof2-viKCQl.... Jeff’s intention for this new model was to take into consideration recent discussions on Model 5 and incorporate those discussions accordingly. Best, Steve From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Friday, July 31, 2020 at 1:30 PM To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Tuesday, 04 August at 03:00 UTC for 90 Minutes Dear WG Members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the WG meeting on Tuesday, 04 August 2020 at 03:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Proposed Agenda: Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest Final Report Structure and Public Comment Survey Closed Generics (new proposals due Monday, 03 August at 23:59 UTC) Review Private Resolutions – Model 6 (link TBD) AOB If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs@icann.org. Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Hi Steve, Hi Jeff, Steve, thanks for sending out Model 6. Unfortunately I won’t be able to make the call at 04 00 my time later today. Here is my take .. there are a lot of ideas and solutions to problems A lot need strengthening and clarifying Overview 1 . My personal view is that if there is any form of partnership / JV that results in a financial consolidation of two or more original individual applications then this is deemed material . It WILL require an immediate submission of the full consolidated financial pack for an immediate new financial evaluation by the evaluators. It would also trigger a new public comment period , a new period to file objections ( due to the material changing circumstances ) . I think we should add that these objections could include any competition , anti trust issues. 2. As to Justine point . Applicants will Not be allowed to adjust their sealed bids,( irrespective of whether any contention set has shrunk ) IDEA However they will be able to / allowed to resubmit a new sealed bid up to 2 weeks before on the announcement of the date of the auction ( whether private or the public last resort auction) . Rebuttable presumptions : I’m in agreement with Christa re ( g) . This whole idea is very confusing and will be very very difficult to prove. Agree with Christa on adding another clause . IDEA : perhaps we get contention set applicants to submit a Reconciliation Statement of Use of Funds ( in resolving over 3 contention sets ) , which would have to be submitted to the financial evaluators . Have a good call later . Thanks Phil Phil Buckingham Sent from my iPhone
On 3 Aug 2020, at 19:20, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Dear WG Members,
In respect of agenda item 4, please find the link for Model 6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qdNbLO1-EfXdQosA7fK1ugQtaaMzwof2-viKCQl.... Jeff’s intention for this new model was to take into consideration recent discussions on Model 5 and incorporate those discussions accordingly.
Best, Steve
From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Friday, July 31, 2020 at 1:30 PM To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Tuesday, 04 August at 03:00 UTC for 90 Minutes
Dear WG Members,
Please find below the proposed agenda for the WG meeting on Tuesday, 04 August 2020 at 03:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
Proposed Agenda:
Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest Final Report Structure and Public Comment Survey Closed Generics (new proposals due Monday, 03 August at 23:59 UTC) Review Private Resolutions – Model 6 (link TBD) AOB
If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs@icann.org.
Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Phil, The new financial evaluation model for SubPro doesn't include submitting business details, only certification of them. So a new submission is expected, but it will only contain updated certification for the new business details, not the details per se. It seems people still think of it using the angle of the 2012 financial evaluation, but this is one area where lot of changes were agreed to by the WG. Rubens
On 3 Aug 2020, at 21:25, Phil Buckingham <phil@dotadvice.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Steve, Hi Jeff,
Steve, thanks for sending out Model 6. Unfortunately I won’t be able to make the call at 04 00 my time later today. Here is my take .. there are a lot of ideas and solutions to problems A lot need strengthening and clarifying Overview 1 . My personal view is that if there is any form of partnership / JV that results in a financial consolidation of two or more original individual applications then this is deemed material . It WILL require an immediate submission of the full consolidated financial pack for an immediate new financial evaluation by the evaluators. It would also trigger a new public comment period , a new period to file objections ( due to the material changing circumstances ) . I think we should add that these objections could include any competition , anti trust issues.
Rebuttable presumptions : I’m in agreement with Christa re ( g) . This whole idea is very confusing and will be very very difficult to prove. Agree with Christa on adding another clause . IDEA : perhaps we get contention set applicants to submit a Reconciliation Statement of Use of Funds ( in resolving over 3 contention sets ) , which would have to be submitted to the financial evaluators .
Hi Phil, You wrote: 2. As to Justine point . Applicants will Not be allowed to adjust their sealed bids,( irrespective of whether any contention set has shrunk ) IDEA However they will be able to / allowed to resubmit a new sealed bid up to 2 weeks before on the announcement of the date of the auction ( whether private or the public last resort auction) . That opens up all kinds of room for trickery. Each of the both applicants provided a sealed bid after they were informed that their string is in contention in some way form or shape. When they create a JV they may choose either of the both bids. Otherwise all contention set members would have to be able to submit a new bid – and we had a reason to make sure applicants do not have any knowledge against whom they are bidding, or against how many. Thanks, Alexander From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Phil Buckingham Sent: Dienstag, 4. August 2020 03:25 To: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Tuesday, 04 August at 03:00 UTC for 90 Minutes Hi Steve, Hi Jeff, Steve, thanks for sending out Model 6. Unfortunately I won’t be able to make the call at 04 00 my time later today. Here is my take .. there are a lot of ideas and solutions to problems A lot need strengthening and clarifying Overview 1 . My personal view is that if there is any form of partnership / JV that results in a financial consolidation of two or more original individual applications then this is deemed material . It WILL require an immediate submission of the full consolidated financial pack for an immediate new financial evaluation by the evaluators. It would also trigger a new public comment period , a new period to file objections ( due to the material changing circumstances ) . I think we should add that these objections could include any competition , anti trust issues. 2. As to Justine point . Applicants will Not be allowed to adjust their sealed bids,( irrespective of whether any contention set has shrunk ) IDEA However they will be able to / allowed to resubmit a new sealed bid up to 2 weeks before on the announcement of the date of the auction ( whether private or the public last resort auction) . Rebuttable presumptions : I’m in agreement with Christa re ( g) . This whole idea is very confusing and will be very very difficult to prove. Agree with Christa on adding another clause . IDEA : perhaps we get contention set applicants to submit a Reconciliation Statement of Use of Funds ( in resolving over 3 contention sets ) , which would have to be submitted to the financial evaluators . Have a good call later . Thanks Phil Phil Buckingham Sent from my iPhone On 3 Aug 2020, at 19:20, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org <mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> > wrote: Dear WG Members, In respect of agenda item 4, please find the link for Model 6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qdNbLO1-EfXdQosA7fK1ugQtaaMzwof2-viKCQl.... Jeff’s intention for this new model was to take into consideration recent discussions on Model 5 and incorporate those discussions accordingly. Best, Steve From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org> > Date: Friday, July 31, 2020 at 1:30 PM To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> " <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> > Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Tuesday, 04 August at 03:00 UTC for 90 Minutes Dear WG Members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the WG meeting on Tuesday, 04 August 2020 at 03:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Proposed Agenda: 1. Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest 2. Final Report Structure and Public Comment Survey 3. Closed Generics (new proposals due Monday, 03 August at 23:59 UTC) 4. Review Private Resolutions – Model 6 (link TBD) 5. AOB If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs@icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> . Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (4)
-
Alexander Schubert -
Phil Buckingham -
Rubens Kuhl -
Steve Chan