Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics
Dear all, The final text on Predictability and Closed Generics is now available for your review in the production document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S4aOGxln9b93E_j3eF-dm0E6M8-VYToD8U9AkPlP...>. The edits based on the action items from the WG’s recent deliberations on 13 August<https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2020-08-13+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Pro...> are reflected in the redlines. The deadline for comments is Tuesday, 18 August at 23:59 UTC. * Please limit feedback to errors in the edits, for example a revision that you believe does not accurately reflect the outcome of discussions about a “Can’t Live With” item. * Please send this type of feedback to the mailing list. Typo corrections can be sent directly to staff. * Please do not raise new issues, introduce new “Can’t Live With” items, or re-open deliberations. Kind regards, Julie
Hi all, In reviewing the Predictability Framework, I realized we overlooked a problem in prior drafts. The Recommendation says that the GNSO Council “may” review the work of the SPIRT and the Implementation Guidance is the section which notes that GNSO Council procedures take precedence. The statement below belongs in the Recommendation section and not the Implementation Guidance section. It is governed by the ByLaws and we will create confusion if it is characterized as “Implementation Guidance.” So please use this sentence in the Recommendation portion of the Predictability Framework. 2.2.2 b. “In fact, the GNSO processes and procedures are incorporated into the Predictability Framework explicitly. In the event of a conflict, existing GNSO processes and procedures, including the GNSO Input Process, GNSO Guidance Process, and EPDP as contained in the Annexes to the GNSO Operating Procedures take precedence.” Thank you, Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 12:45 PM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Dear all, The final text on Predictability and Closed Generics is now available for your review in the production document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S4aOGxln9b93E_j3eF-dm0E6M8-VYToD8U9AkPlP...>. The edits based on the action items from the WG’s recent deliberations on 13 August<https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2020-08-13+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Pro...> are reflected in the redlines. The deadline for comments is Tuesday, 18 August at 23:59 UTC. * Please limit feedback to errors in the edits, for example a revision that you believe does not accurately reflect the outcome of discussions about a “Can’t Live With” item. * Please send this type of feedback to the mailing list. Typo corrections can be sent directly to staff. * Please do not raise new issues, introduce new “Can’t Live With” items, or re-open deliberations. Kind regards, Julie ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Anne, Although I understand your point, I would rather not make this change to the report now, but ask that you submit this as one of your public comments. I can see arguments on both sides of this and I am leery of making any changes at this late point without having a discussion of the group and understanding the impacts. Thanks. Sincerely, Jeff [cid:image001.png@01D67617.CCF67E80] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:38 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Cc: Jeff Neuman <jeff@jjnsolutions.com>; Cheryl Langdon-Orr (cheryl@hovtek.com.au) <cheryl@hovtek.com.au> Subject: RE: Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics Hi all, In reviewing the Predictability Framework, I realized we overlooked a problem in prior drafts. The Recommendation says that the GNSO Council “may” review the work of the SPIRT and the Implementation Guidance is the section which notes that GNSO Council procedures take precedence. The statement below belongs in the Recommendation section and not the Implementation Guidance section. It is governed by the ByLaws and we will create confusion if it is characterized as “Implementation Guidance.” So please use this sentence in the Recommendation portion of the Predictability Framework. 2.2.2 b. “In fact, the GNSO processes and procedures are incorporated into the Predictability Framework explicitly. In the event of a conflict, existing GNSO processes and procedures, including the GNSO Input Process, GNSO Guidance Process, and EPDP as contained in the Annexes to the GNSO Operating Procedures take precedence.” Thank you, Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 12:45 PM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Dear all, The final text on Predictability and Closed Generics is now available for your review in the production document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S4aOGxln9b93E_j3eF-dm0E6M8-VYToD8U9AkPlP...>. The edits based on the action items from the WG’s recent deliberations on 13 August<https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2020-08-13+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Pro...> are reflected in the redlines. The deadline for comments is Tuesday, 18 August at 23:59 UTC. * Please limit feedback to errors in the edits, for example a revision that you believe does not accurately reflect the outcome of discussions about a “Can’t Live With” item. * Please send this type of feedback to the mailing list. Typo corrections can be sent directly to staff. * Please do not raise new issues, introduce new “Can’t Live With” items, or re-open deliberations. Kind regards, Julie ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Hi Jeff, Obviously any changes at this stage are inconvenient, I totally agree. And obviously it would indeed require “having a discussion of the group and understanding the impacts.”. Question is: Would that be feasible, are there others out there that would support a short discussion on this topic? Alexander From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Mittwoch, 19. August 2020 17:59 To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Cc: Cheryl Langdon-Orr (cheryl@hovtek.com.au) <cheryl@hovtek.com.au> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics Anne, Although I understand your point, I would rather not make this change to the report now, but ask that you submit this as one of your public comments. I can see arguments on both sides of this and I am leery of making any changes at this late point without “. Thanks. Sincerely, Jeff Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: <mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> jeff@jjnsolutions.com http://jjnsolutions.com From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:38 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org> >; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Cc: Jeff Neuman <jeff@jjnsolutions.com <mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> >; Cheryl Langdon-Orr (cheryl@hovtek.com.au <mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au> ) <cheryl@hovtek.com.au <mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au> > Subject: RE: Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics Hi all, In reviewing the Predictability Framework, I realized we overlooked a problem in prior drafts. The Recommendation says that the GNSO Council “may” review the work of the SPIRT and the Implementation Guidance is the section which notes that GNSO Council procedures take precedence. The statement below belongs in the Recommendation section and not the Implementation Guidance section. It is governed by the ByLaws and we will create confusion if it is characterized as “Implementation Guidance.” So please use this sentence in the Recommendation portion of the Predictability Framework. 2.2.2 b. “In fact, the GNSO processes and procedures are incorporated into the Predictability Framework explicitly. In the event of a conflict, existing GNSO processes and procedures, including the GNSO Input Process, GNSO Guidance Process, and EPDP as contained in the Annexes to the GNSO Operating Procedures take precedence.” Thank you, Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> > On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 12:45 PM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics [EXTERNAL] _____ Dear all, The final text on Predictability and Closed Generics is now available for your review in the production document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S4aOGxln9b93E_j3eF-dm0E6M8-VYToD8U9AkPlP...> . The edits based on the action items from the WG’s recent deliberations on 13 August <https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2020-08-13+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Pro...> are reflected in the redlines. The deadline for comments is Tuesday, 18 August at 23:59 UTC. * Please limit feedback to errors in the edits, for example a revision that you believe does not accurately reflect the outcome of discussions about a “Can’t Live With” item. * Please send this type of feedback to the mailing list. Typo corrections can be sent directly to staff. * Please do not raise new issues, introduce new “Can’t Live With” items, or re-open deliberations. Kind regards, Julie _____ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Alexander, We are putting the finishing touches on the report and the survey form in order to get the report tomorrow. I am afraid there is no time for another call before it goes out. Sorry. [cid:image001.png@01D67623.DF5152B0] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Alexander Schubert Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 12:00 PM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics Hi Jeff, Obviously any changes at this stage are inconvenient, I totally agree. And obviously it would indeed require “having a discussion of the group and understanding the impacts.”. Question is: Would that be feasible, are there others out there that would support a short discussion on this topic? Alexander From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Mittwoch, 19. August 2020 17:59 To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Cc: Cheryl Langdon-Orr (cheryl@hovtek.com.au<mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au>) <cheryl@hovtek.com.au<mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics Anne, Although I understand your point, I would rather not make this change to the report now, but ask that you submit this as one of your public comments. I can see arguments on both sides of this and I am leery of making any changes at this late point without “. Thanks. Sincerely, Jeff [cid:image002.png@01D67623.DF5152B0] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:38 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Cc: Jeff Neuman <jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com>>; Cheryl Langdon-Orr (cheryl@hovtek.com.au<mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au>) <cheryl@hovtek.com.au<mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au>> Subject: RE: Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics Hi all, In reviewing the Predictability Framework, I realized we overlooked a problem in prior drafts. The Recommendation says that the GNSO Council “may” review the work of the SPIRT and the Implementation Guidance is the section which notes that GNSO Council procedures take precedence. The statement below belongs in the Recommendation section and not the Implementation Guidance section. It is governed by the ByLaws and we will create confusion if it is characterized as “Implementation Guidance.” So please use this sentence in the Recommendation portion of the Predictability Framework. 2.2.2 b. “In fact, the GNSO processes and procedures are incorporated into the Predictability Framework explicitly. In the event of a conflict, existing GNSO processes and procedures, including the GNSO Input Process, GNSO Guidance Process, and EPDP as contained in the Annexes to the GNSO Operating Procedures take precedence.” Thank you, Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 12:45 PM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Deadline Tuesday, 18 August: Final Check on Predictability and Closed Generics [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Dear all, The final text on Predictability and Closed Generics is now available for your review in the production document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S4aOGxln9b93E_j3eF-dm0E6M8-VYToD8U9AkPlP...>. The edits based on the action items from the WG’s recent deliberations on 13 August<https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2020-08-13+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Pro...> are reflected in the redlines. The deadline for comments is Tuesday, 18 August at 23:59 UTC. * Please limit feedback to errors in the edits, for example a revision that you believe does not accurately reflect the outcome of discussions about a “Can’t Live With” item. * Please send this type of feedback to the mailing list. Typo corrections can be sent directly to staff. * Please do not raise new issues, introduce new “Can’t Live With” items, or re-open deliberations. Kind regards, Julie ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
participants (4)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Alexander Schubert -
Jeff Neuman -
Julie Hedlund