On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
Particularly, I think that if products sold are tainted, then there is plenty of other consumer protection law that applies...why are we trying to solve that problem?
My question as well...although backed into...maybe from a different philosophical perspective. Just one clear distinction. My view makes no distinction between a registrar as P/P provider or a non-registrar providing a P/P service; so far as I care, its the service that must be regulated, and same rules apply, regardless of origin or primary business of the provider. The risk is directly connected to service provision. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================