+1 Brian J. Winterfeldt Head of Internet Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 m/ (202) 903-4422 brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com> / www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/> From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:48 AM To: Metalitz, Steven Cc: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Following up today's discussion on transferring names Makes sense to me. On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@msk.com<mailto:met@msk.com>> wrote: I agree the discussion and presentation today were highly relevant to relay. On B 3 itself, should we be specifying that one responsibility of accredited providers is to fully disclose to customers how use of their service may impact the customer's ability to transfer to another registrar? (Or, put another way, how efforts to transfer will affect provision of the service.) If the relay obligation is sufficiently robust, then this disclosure requirement might be less important, but it would be worthwhile to mark this point here, pending the relay discussion. Steve Metalitz From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Farrell Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:35 AM To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Following up today's discussion on transferring names Dear Don / Steve / James and Mary, Thanks so much for the presentation on today's call. I learnt a lot about how the privacy & proxy services interact with the transfer policies, which was hugely helpful. Can we make sure we tie this information / discussion into the relevant work items? My suggestion is that we would come back to what we learnt today when we come to talk about 'relay', and also towards the end of our work in the wrap-up side of things to do a sanity check on how any possible recommendations might impact on the transfer policy. Does that make sense? Or perhaps it fits into other areas I haven't considered. Many thanks to James for the presentation. All the best, Maria _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg =========================================================== CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). ===========================================================