But remember it was encoded first ;) So falling into enemy hands would not have helped. Now you could argue the time it might take the complainer to decipher the code could be construed as being outside of the "within a timely manner" - but the wording, at least the way I read it does not require us to provide a cipher though, so... Kind regards, Chris From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com> To: "John Horton" <john.horton@legitscript.com>, "James Gannon" <james@cyberinvasion.net> Cc: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 18:09:49 Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Correction No idea of the context, but here’s a great story about the skeleton of a carrier pigeon (message still attached) found during restoration of a home in Surrey. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2226203/Skeleton-hero-World-War-II-c... Looks like I picked the wrong week to miss a PPSAI call. J. From: < gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org > on behalf of John Horton < john.horton@legitscript.com > Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 11:09 To: James Gannon < james@cyberinvasion.net > Cc: PPSAI WG < gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Correction Are we going to allow these pigeons to remain anonymous? Shouldn't we require them to disclose their identities -- particularly if they are selling communication services to the public? As you all surely know, a lot of them are just fly-by-night businesses. John Horton President and CEO, LegitScript Follow Legit Script : LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Blog | Google+ On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:04 AM, James Gannon < james@cyberinvasion.net > wrote: I’m happy to consider RFC1149 https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt for our purposes here, however even carrier pidgeons recommend encryption BQ_BEGIN Security Considerations Security is not generally a problem in normal operation, but special measures must be taken (such as data encryption) when avian carriers are used in a tactical environment Always willing to come to a compromise =) -James Gannon From: < gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org > on behalf of "Don M. Blumenthal" Date: Tuesday 29 September 2015 16:24 To: PPSAI Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Correction For this morning’s callers. Passenger pigeons are extinct. Carrier pigeon still is a viable option. I originally wrote that carrier pigeons still are on the table. I’m glad that I reread. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg BQ_END _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
