Dear All, Please find below the input from the ISPCP question as referred to in the meeting. We'll also get this posted on the wiki with the other statements received. Best regards, Marika On 24/06/14 10:20, "Christian Dawson" <dawson@servint.com> wrote:
Mary, here is the ISPCP response, thank you:
Survey response of the ISPCP Constituency:
The Internet Service Providers and Connectivity Providers operate Internet backbone networks and/or provide access to Internet and related services to End Users. We are key players on the Internet, and have an essential role in its stability and development. The Internet Service Providers and Connectivity Providers Constituency seeks to selectively respond to the GNSO Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Working Group Community Questions for London.
We focus comments only on Category C, and seek to state unequivocally that we do not believe in a threshold for privacy & proxy services. We do not believe that it is appropriate or in-scope for this group to address this, nor do we believe it necessary or practical for ICANN to require categorization of use for a domain of any contracted party. We therefore file the following official responses on behalf of our constituency:
Category C Question 1: No. Category C Question 2: No.