Good Morning, Mary. I will be prepared to discuss findings on the call tomorrow for Question 1, and also hope to have a written summary prepared. On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Hello everyone – thanks, Terri and Lindsay, for volunteering to take on Question 1 (which does have the most and rather voluminous comments). If it’s not asking too much, do you think you’ll be in a position to give a brief update (even orally) to the WG on the call tomorrow?
Assuming Terri and Lindsay are fine with reviewing Question 1 as a team of two, perhaps the next step would be for this Sub Team to discuss their findings/summaries (following the WG call tomorrow), and for others to do the same type of review/summary for the remaining questions? Again, please let me know if you will be needing any assistance from staff in this process.
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org
From: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 09:45 To: Terri Stumme <terri.stumme@legitscript.com> Cc: Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com>, Mary Wong < mary.wong@icann.org>, "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> Subject: RE: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination
Hi Terri
Well I have not started yet so I will take comments 40 to 87 then on question 1. As the comments have already been sorted into the relevant questions, I will summarise the responses in a word document then.
Many thanks
Lindsay
*Lindsay Hamilton-Reid*
Legal Counsel
*Direct: *+44 (0)1452 509145 | *Mobile:* 07720 091147 | *Email:* Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1and1.co.uk
*www.fasthosts.co.uk <http://www.fasthosts.co.uk/> **www.1and1.co.uk <http://www.1and1.co.uk/>*
[image: fh-1and1]
? 2015 All rights reserved. Fasthosts is the trading name of Fasthosts Internet Limited. Company registration no. 03656438. Registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Discovery House, 154 Southgate Street, Gloucester, GL1 2EX. VAT no. 720821857. 1&1 is the trading name of 1&1 Internet Limited. Company registration no. 03953678. Registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Discovery House, 154 Southgate Street, Gloucester, GL1 2EX. VAT no. 752539027.
This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disclose, copy or use any part of it - please delete all copies immediately and notify 1&1 on 0844 335 1211 or Fasthosts on 0333 0142 700. Any statements, opinions or information in this message are provided by the author, not on behalf of 1&1 and/or Fasthosts, unless subsequently confirmed by an individual who is authorised to represent 1&1 and/or Fasthosts.
*From:* Terri Stumme [mailto:terri.stumme@legitscript.com <terri.stumme@legitscript.com>] *Sent:* 03 August 2015 14:27 *To:* Lindsay Hamilton-Reid <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> *Cc:* Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com>; Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>; gnso-ppsai2@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination
I have actually started going through question 1, and it is taking longer than I anticipated. I'm sorting the responses and have made it to response #15.
Should I continue on this path so as to complete by tomorrow's call?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Lindsay Hamilton-Reid < Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> wrote:
Hi Kiran
I am happy to look at question 1 today and summarise but as I have no idea what anyone else is doing, I could take on a different question. I should have an initial summary by the call tomorrow but this is going to take a lot more work. What about everyone else? What has been done so far?
Many thanks
Lindsay
-----Original Message----- From: gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kiran Malancharuvil Sent: 31 July 2015 22:38 To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Cc: gnso-ppsai2@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination
Dear All,
It's my opinion that we need more time to explore the comments and the implications on permissible use.
Has anyone started the work on this?
Kiran
Kiran Malancharuvil
Policy Counselor
MarkMonitor
415-419-9138 (m)
Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
On Jul 31, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Hello everyone, at the risk of being pesky I thought I’d change the
subject title in case you didn’t see my earlier email (below)
suggesting a possible approach to the work of this Sub Team. Please
accept my apologies if you’ve already begun your work and so don’t need this reminder!
If you should need to do a Sub Team call, especially if you are
scheduling one before the next WG meeting on Tuesday, staff would
greatly appreciate your letting us know as soon as possible since we
will need to set up the recording and (if you need one) the AC room.
Thanks again, and have a great weekend,
Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
Email: mary.wong@icann.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 19:37
To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] testing
Loud and clear, Stephanie - thanks, and welcome, everyone, to Sub
Team 2 (dealing with Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report)!
It will be much appreciated if you can move all future email
discussions to this mailing list.
Please note also that I have noticed - in going over the comments
received again - that one comment relevant to your topic seems to
have been edited over in my formatting of the original Word document.
This is a comment from Web.com, which I have now added as ROW 85 on
page 30. No other changes have been made to the original document circulated previously.
I¹ll update the wiki page accordingly.
Given the extensive nature of the comments (especially for the more
general Question 1) and the fact that there are 7 members of this Sub
Team, would it be a good idea for this Sub Team to divide the work
such that 3 people (for instance) can do the first sweep through
Question 1 (perhaps taking 25-30 comments each), 2 take on Question 2
(dividing the comments in half), 1 person do Question 3 and the last
person do the remaining general comments?
This could be the first phase, and each person could use the same
format to ensure consistency - whether that be the template provided
or something like what Sub Team 1 (for Section 1.3.2) is doing, per this week¹s report.
Following this initial phase, the Sub Team can then come together
(having read one another¹s submissions) to agree on recommendations
to be made by the Sub Team as a whole to the WG.
If this approach makes sense, perhaps we can take volunteers for each
³sub part² so that there will be something to report back to the full
WG with this coming Tuesday?
Thanks and cheers
Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
Email: mary.wong@icann.org
-----Original Message-----
From: <gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin
<stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca>
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 19:14
To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai2] testing
testing
SP
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list
Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list
Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list
Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
--
*Terri Stumme*
*Intelligence Analyst*
-- *Terri Stumme* *Intelligence Analyst*
