Dear All, It's my opinion that we need more time to explore the comments and the implications on permissible use. Has anyone started the work on this? Kiran Kiran Malancharuvil Policy Counselor MarkMonitor 415-419-9138 (m) Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
On Jul 31, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Hello everyone, at the risk of being pesky I thought I’d change the subject title in case you didn’t see my earlier email (below) suggesting a possible approach to the work of this Sub Team. Please accept my apologies if you’ve already begun your work and so don’t need this reminder!
If you should need to do a Sub Team call, especially if you are scheduling one before the next WG meeting on Tuesday, staff would greatly appreciate your letting us know as soon as possible since we will need to set up the recording and (if you need one) the AC room.
Thanks again, and have a great weekend,
Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org
-----Original Message----- From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 19:37 To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] testing
Loud and clear, Stephanie - thanks, and welcome, everyone, to Sub Team 2 (dealing with Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report)!
It will be much appreciated if you can move all future email discussions to this mailing list.
Please note also that I have noticed - in going over the comments received again - that one comment relevant to your topic seems to have been edited over in my formatting of the original Word document. This is a comment from Web.com, which I have now added as ROW 85 on page 30. No other changes have been made to the original document circulated previously. I¹ll update the wiki page accordingly.
Given the extensive nature of the comments (especially for the more general Question 1) and the fact that there are 7 members of this Sub Team, would it be a good idea for this Sub Team to divide the work such that 3 people (for instance) can do the first sweep through Question 1 (perhaps taking 25-30 comments each), 2 take on Question 2 (dividing the comments in half), 1 person do Question 3 and the last person do the remaining general comments?
This could be the first phase, and each person could use the same format to ensure consistency - whether that be the template provided or something like what Sub Team 1 (for Section 1.3.2) is doing, per this week¹s report. Following this initial phase, the Sub Team can then come together (having read one another¹s submissions) to agree on recommendations to be made by the Sub Team as a whole to the WG.
If this approach makes sense, perhaps we can take volunteers for each ³sub part² so that there will be something to report back to the full WG with this coming Tuesday?
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org
-----Original Message----- From: <gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 19:14 To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai2] testing
testing SP _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2