I leave for the airport for Dublin in about 3 hours, so I'm not sure what can be finalized on the other categories before then. I think we need to get what we have to the full WG today so that they have time to think it through. We can always supplement later. Best, Paul From: gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 11:02 AM To: gnso-ppsai4@icann.org; Mary Wong Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai4] Updated Sub Team 4 report Hi Mary and All, I think we should finalize F and G before we circulate to the full WG. I'll circulate something to our subteam in a bit. Best, Kathy On 10/13/2015 10:57 AM, Mary Wong wrote: Hello members of Sub Team 4, The WG co-chairs would like to finalize the Dublin F2F meeting agenda, including sending out the updated Sub Team report before the end of the day. If there are no objections, I'll proceed to do so with, of course, all the usual caveats. Kathy and Paul, how do you want to approach the topics that we did not manage to cover on the Friday call (Categories F and G)? Perhaps Sub Team members can send their thoughts, concerns and comments to this list before the Dublin F2F meeting to kickstart an email discussion so that you can determine how best to present those topics? Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Date: Monday, October 12, 2015 at 18:18 To: <gnso-ppsai4@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai4@icann.org>> Cc: 'PPSAI Chairs' <gnso-ppsai-chairs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-chairs@icann.org>> Subject: Updated Sub Team 4 report Dear WG chairs and Sub Team 4 members, As requested by the Sub Team 4 members who were able to participate in the Friday call, I've updated the Sub Team 4 report to reflect that discussion. Please note that this document has not yet been reviewed by any Sub Team 4 member, and represents staff's attempt to capture the gist of the Friday discussion. I have accepted all the changes from Categories A through E that were in the last version circulated by Kathy (version 3), so this document (version 4) shows the changes I've made in those five categories, while retaining all the previous changes and comments that are in Category F and Category G, which the Sub Team did not get through on Friday. Also attached is a summary document that contains only the recommendations and conclusions from the draft Sub Team report (as updated). I am including this as I thought it may make it easier for Don, Steve and Graeme to review, to see where things are. Don, Steve and Graeme - please note that several items have been flagged for further WG discussion, and have been marked as such in both documents. While each recommendation should certainly be reviewed by all WG members, these flagged items represent either topics where the Sub Team has not yet come to agreement or otherwise believes the topic should be brought back to the full WG. Of these topics, I believe that on the Friday call the group highlighted the question as to whether accreditation could lead to the loss of the right to counsel (Category D-2) as being the one item likely to be most usefully discussed at the Friday face to face meeting. Another topic that could be raised at the Friday meeting is the question of penalties for repetitive abuses of the program (Category C-2). Kathy, Paul, Vicky and all - can you confirm or otherwise highlight, the topics that you think would benefit particularly from a WG discussion on Friday? Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai4 mailing list Gnso-ppsai4@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai4@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai4 The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.