I dont think ICANN supports Etherpad, at least we always wind up doing our own in NCSG.... On 2016-06-30 4:01, DANIEL NANGHAKA wrote:
Thanks Shane for putting it up.
ᐧ
Regards Nanghaka Daniel K. Executive Director - ILICIT Africa / Council Member - FOSSFA / Community Lead - ISOC Uganda Chapter Mobile +256 772 898298 (Uganda) Skype: daniel.nanghaka
----------------------------------------- /"Working for Africa" /-----------------------------------------
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org <mailto:shane@time-travellers.org>> wrote:
Daniel,
I've put up an Etherpad here:
https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/gnso-rds-pbstatement-0
I did a quick search to see if there was an ICANN Etherpad and didn't find one. If there is a better spot we can move there.
I also made a note that since RDAP seems to be included as a sort of mandate that we should document that too, although I have no proposed text since I'm a bit uncertain if this is true or if it is to what extent. ;)
Cheers,
-- Shane
At 2016-06-30 10:20:54 +0300 DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang@gmail.com <mailto:dndannang@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks Shane, > > Then I suggest we could use possible alternatives like the Etherpad > http://etherpad.org since China does not like google. > > > ᐧ > > > Regards > Nanghaka Daniel K. > Executive Director - ILICIT Africa / Council Member - FOSSFA / Community > Lead - ISOC Uganda Chapter > Mobile +256 772 898298 <tel:%2B256%20772%20898298> (Uganda) > Skype: daniel.nanghaka > > ----------------------------------------- *"Working for Africa" * > ----------------------------------------- > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org <mailto:shane@time-travellers.org>> > wrote: > > > Daniel, > > > > Thank you very much for kicking this off! > > > > At 2016-06-30 09:19:38 +0300 > > DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang@gmail.com <mailto:dndannang@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > Please find the attached the draft problem statement. > > > > I think we need to have a few sentences documenting the constraints > > of the RDS WG: > > > > The RDS WG will not consider the questions of: > > > > 1. Whether publishing WHOIS-style data is necessary > > 2. What data registries will collect > > 3. How registry data is managed > > > > I do not like these constraints, but if they are there then it I think > > that it is important to document them so it is clear that these are > > off-charter. > > > > It would also be good to document where such limitations came from, but > > I don't know that. > > > > If these are NOT limits, then I think the problem statement should > > include these questions as high-priority topics to be addressed before > > anything else. > > > > > I would also like to recommend probably we create a google doc for easy > > > review and comments. > > > > I don't really mind using a Google document for this, but it might be > > nice to try to find an alternate way to jointly edit stuff. (My reason > > is that China hates Google. When I am working out of my company's > > offices in Beijing it is a pain in the ass to use any Google cloud > > stuff.) > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Shane > >
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt mailing list Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt