Hi all, I have received some offline feedback on the current statement, many feel its good and I received the following feedback The first paragraph seems fine to me but the next two paragraph seem to get into deliberation. I don’t personally disagree with the statements made but it seems to me that assumptions about future WG decisions on requirements should be avoided. For example: “An important aspect of safety on the Internet has been a reasonable assumption of privacy.” The third paragraph also seems to assume requirements that we have not yet agreed on. It may be that the 2nd & 3rd paragraphs could be worded more as problem statements instead of assumptions of fact. Can someone who has been holding the pen actively try and work this feedback into the current statement? -James