Daniel, Thank you very much for kicking this off! At 2016-06-30 09:19:38 +0300 DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang@gmail.com> wrote:
Please find the attached the draft problem statement.
I think we need to have a few sentences documenting the constraints of the RDS WG: The RDS WG will not consider the questions of: 1. Whether publishing WHOIS-style data is necessary 2. What data registries will collect 3. How registry data is managed I do not like these constraints, but if they are there then it I think that it is important to document them so it is clear that these are off-charter. It would also be good to document where such limitations came from, but I don't know that. If these are NOT limits, then I think the problem statement should include these questions as high-priority topics to be addressed before anything else.
I would also like to recommend probably we create a google doc for easy review and comments.
I don't really mind using a Google document for this, but it might be nice to try to find an alternate way to jointly edit stuff. (My reason is that China hates Google. When I am working out of my company's offices in Beijing it is a pain in the ass to use any Google cloud stuff.) Cheers, -- Shane