Thanks so much Alan, really appreciate the work DT1 put into this. Would you be willing to present your teams work on the call today? We are asking each DT to provide a quick overview of 5 minutes. You can let the WG know this is not completely final but that the team is getting close. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Alan Woods <alan@donuts.email> wrote:
Dear Susan,
Many thanks for helping this push along. Alas we did not have enough members present at our scheduled meeting last Friday to continue. Jim Galvin made some edits to the document, which were minor and I have taken the liberty of accepting them through now, in the following Google Doc
https://docs.google.com/a/afilias.info/document/d/1PSWtRhOez C83Wa-9Et3zqtT7KcOr3YpJxij7MCTG6o8/edit?disco=AAAABa6hl3E& ts=5a05ab1a&usp=comment_email_document
In particular the change you suggested to the definition above (thank you Susan), were caught by Jim where we removed the reference to WHOIS.
To the remaining members of the Group,
I can but suggest that we please all review and provide final comments by tomorrow, (ideally by COB today) as the clock is ticking for our final input on this, and we are behind the curve on our document. (For what it's worth, and I'm only a newbie in this process - I am happy as to the document where it currently is)
Kind regards,
Alan
PS: if there are any issues in accessing this document, please let me know.
[image: Donuts Inc.] <http://donuts.domains> Alan Woods Compliance Manager, Donuts Inc. ------------------------------ One Clarendon Row <https://maps.google.com/?q=Clarendon+Row+%0D+Dublin+2,+County+Dublin+%0D+Ire...> Dublin 2, County Dublin Ireland
<https://www.facebook.com/donutstlds> <https://twitter.com/DonutsInc> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/donuts-inc>
Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Donuts Inc. . Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Susan Kawaguchi <susankpolicy@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,
Since Michele is out sick I am trying to help move things forward. We will be discussing all the drafting team's work tomorrow on the working group call. We need someone from the DT to provide the final document and present the definition and high level overview of your work.
Please let me know who will present for DT1
The leadership has been encouraging the DT's to standardized the format of the definition and to focus on the "information collected". I have suggested changes to the definition below but up to the DT to revise the definition.
*Technical Resolution*
"Information collected to enable contact of the relevant contacts to facilitate tracing, identification and resolution of incidents, which relate, either entirely or in part, to technical issues relating to the DNS.
Use of such data should ordinarily be limited to those who are affected by such issues, or by those persons who are tasked (directly or indirectly) with the resolution of such matters on their behalf."
*Academic Research *
"Information collected to enable use of aggregate WHOIS data elements by researchers and other similar persons, as a source for academic or other public interest studies or research, relating either solely or in part, to the use of the DNS."
Talk to you all tomorrow.
Susan
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rds-pdp-1 mailing list Gnso-rds-pdp-1@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-1