DT4, please take a look at the draft distributed on Tuesday: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-4/attachments/20180227/24383c98/D... And Erica’s feedback below. Any further inputs? Thanks in advance for helping address these questions as input to our F2F at ICANN61. Speaking of which: who plans to participate in person or remotely? Best Lisa Thanks very much Erica – Does anyone have any suggested text for why the registrars need to be identified or contacted (and by whom), the expectations of the registrars, etc? We may also want to add something about the benefit to both buyer and seller – a point raised on yesterday’s WG call but after I took my first cut at that draft. Best, Lisa From: Erica Varlese [mailto:erica at my.blog] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 5:53 AM To: Lisa Phifer Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-4 at icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-4] ICANN61 Prep Assignment Hi Lisa, Thank you for writing the first draft! I read through and only have one minor suggestion. On the following line, I would suggest adding that both the buyer and the seller expect communication to be reliably relayed.
In the case of relayed communication, the buyer **and seller** expect communication to be reliably relayed by the Privacy/Proxy to the authentic entity who has legal rights to sell the domain name. Regarding the final question, I believe the answer is yes. One the seller initiates the transfer, the registrar should complete the translate process post-acquisition. Curious to hear others' thoughts too! Best, Erica