February 2018 - Gnso-rds-pdp-5

Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-5] DT5 Answers to Questions - First Draft for DT Review
by Chuck Feb. 28, 2018

Feb. 28, 2018

My apologies but I have been informed that this message went to DT6 instead of DT5 so I am resending it to DT5. I would appreciate it if the members of DT5 would confirm receipt: Beth Bacon, Theo Geurts, Steve Metalitz, Kris Seeburn, Farell Folly and Bastiaan Goslings. Lisa - the two email addresses are identical except for capitalization. I don't understand what went wrong. Chuck From: Chuck [mailto:consult@cgomes.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 4:13 PM To: 'GNSO-RDS-pdp-5(a)icann.org' <GNSO-RDS-pdp-5(a)icann.org> Subject: DT5 Answers to Questions - First Draft for DT Review Importance: High Drafting Team 5, As those who were on today's call heard, we have decided to take a week to prep for ICANN61 by working on a specific assignment in drafting team mode. Our team's assignment is to reexamine our past output on the Regulatory Action and ICANN Contractual Compliance purposes. You will recall that we separated our previous deliverable into two parts. You find those deliverables at: https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Phase+1+Documents (See the 1st & 2nd links for DT5) to answer the following questions more explicitly and conceptually: 1. Who associated with the domain name registration needs to be identified and/or contacted for each purpose? 2. What is the objective achieved by identifying and/or contacting each of those entities? 3. What might be expected of that entity with regard to the domain name? To prep for ICANN61, it is imperative that we discuss these questions and produce output over the next week - ideally by 5 March but no later than 7 March. We know this is a tall order, given a short timeframe. However, the leadership believes that this will help us use our F2F time at ICANN61 more effectively, which I hope we all agree would be a terrific idea. To give us a head start, attached please find a first draft at answers, prepared by me from our past output. To learn more about this assignment, please read these instructions: <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%2 0Assignment%2026%20Feb.pdf> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%20 Assignment%2026%20Feb.pdf If you were unable to attend today's WG call, please catch up by reading or listening to the call recording/notes/transcript: <https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B> https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B To get started, please ask any questions you may have about this assignment within the next 24 hours. If you have any suggested edits or additions or deletions to the attached first draft, even better! I encourage you to share them in reply to this message, copying the DT mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-6(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-6@icann.org> . Thanks for doing what you can to help this drafting team come through on this new assignment. Chuck

6 6

Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-5] DT5 Answers to Questions - First Draft forDT Review
by Kris Seeburn Feb. 28, 2018

Feb. 28, 2018

confirmed receipt > On Feb 28, 2018, at 18:21, Beth Bacon <bbacon(a)pir.org> wrote: > > <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> You chose to allow Beth Bacon (bbacon(a)pir.org <mailto:bbacon@pir.org>) even though this message failed authentication > Click to disallow <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc_serial=37099974384&tc_rand=1816970790&utm_sou…> > This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (bbacon(a)pir.org <mailto:bbacon@pir.org>) Add cleanup rule <https://www.boxbe.com/popup?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxbe.com%2Fcleanup%3Fkey…> | More info <http://blog.boxbe.com/general/boxbe-automatic-cleanup?tc_serial=37099974409…> > Hi Chuck, > I received both messages. > Thanks! > Beth > <> > From: Gnso-rds-pdp-5 [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-5-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-5-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Chuck > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:16 AM > To: GNSO-RDS-pdp-5(a)icann.org <mailto:GNSO-RDS-pdp-5@icann.org>; gnso-rds-pdp-5(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-5@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-5] DT5 Answers to Questions - First Draft for DT Review > > My apologies but I have been informed that this message went to DT6 instead of DT5 so I am resending it to DT5. I would appreciate it if the members of DT5 would confirm receipt: Beth Bacon, Theo Geurts, Steve Metalitz, Kris Seeburn, Farell Folly and Bastiaan Goslings. > > Lisa – the two email addresses are identical except for capitalization. I don’t understand what went wrong. > > Chuck > > From: Chuck [mailto:consult@cgomes.com <mailto:consult@cgomes.com>] > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 4:13 PM > To: 'GNSO-RDS-pdp-5(a)icann.org <mailto:GNSO-RDS-pdp-5@icann.org>' <GNSO-RDS-pdp-5(a)icann.org <mailto:GNSO-RDS-pdp-5@icann.org>> > Subject: DT5 Answers to Questions – First Draft for DT Review > Importance: High > > Drafting Team 5, > > As those who were on today’s call heard, we have decided to take a week to prep for ICANN61 by working on a specific assignment in drafting team mode. > > Our team’s assignment is to reexamine our past output on the Regulatory Action and ICANN Contractual Compliance purposes. You will recall that we separated our previous deliverable into two parts. You find those deliverables at: > > https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Phase+1+Documents <https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Phase+1+Documents> (See the 1st & 2nd links for DT5) > to answer the following questions more explicitly and conceptually: > > Who associated with the domain name registration needs to be identified and/or contacted for each purpose? > What is the objective achieved by identifying and/or contacting each of those entities? > What might be expected of that entity with regard to the domain name? > > To prep for ICANN61, it is imperative that we discuss these questions and produce output over the next week – ideally by 5 March but no later than 7 March. > > We know this is a tall order, given a short timeframe. However, the leadership believes that this will help us use our F2F time at ICANN61 more effectively, which I hope we all agree would be a terrific idea. > > To give us a head start, attached please find a first draft at answers, prepared by me from our past output. > > To learn more about this assignment, please read these instructions: > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%2… <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%2…> > > If you were unable to attend today’s WG call, please catch up by reading or listening to the call recording/notes/transcript: > https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B <https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B> > > To get started, please ask any questions you may have about this assignment within the next 24 hours. > > If you have any suggested edits or additions or deletions to the attached first draft, even better! I encourage you to share them in reply to this message, copying the DT mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-6(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-6@icann.org> . > > Thanks for doing what you can to help this drafting team come through on this new assignment. > > Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-rds-pdp-5 mailing list > Gnso-rds-pdp-5(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-5@icann.org> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-5 <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-5> Kris Seeburn seeburn.k(a)gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/> "Life is a Beach, it all depends at how you look at it"

1 0

DT5 Answers to Questions - First Draft for DT Review
by Chuck Feb. 28, 2018

Feb. 28, 2018

Drafting Team 5, As those who were on today's call heard, we have decided to take a week to prep for ICANN61 by working on a specific assignment in drafting team mode. Our team's assignment is to reexamine our past output on the Regulatory Action and ICANN Contractual Compliance purposes. You will recall that we separated our previous deliverable into two parts. You find those deliverables at: https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Phase+1+Documents (See the 1st & 2nd links for DT5) to answer the following questions more explicitly and conceptually: 1. Who associated with the domain name registration needs to be identified and/or contacted for each purpose? 2. What is the objective achieved by identifying and/or contacting each of those entities? 3. What might be expected of that entity with regard to the domain name? To prep for ICANN61, it is imperative that we discuss these questions and produce output over the next week - ideally by 5 March but no later than 7 March. We know this is a tall order, given a short timeframe. However, the leadership believes that this will help us use our F2F time at ICANN61 more effectively, which I hope we all agree would be a terrific idea. To give us a head start, attached please find a first draft at answers, prepared by me from our past output. To learn more about this assignment, please read these instructions: <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%2 0Assignment%2026%20Feb.pdf> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%20 Assignment%2026%20Feb.pdf If you were unable to attend today's WG call, please catch up by reading or listening to the call recording/notes/transcript: <https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B> https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B To get started, please ask any questions you may have about this assignment within the next 24 hours. If you have any suggested edits or additions or deletions to the attached first draft, even better! I encourage you to share them in reply to this message, copying the DT mailing list <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-6@icann.org> gnso-rds-pdp-6(a)icann.org . Thanks for doing what you can to help this drafting team come through on this new assignment. Chuck

2 1