Thanks Beth for responding quickly and for all the contributions you made. Chuck From: Beth Bacon [mailto:bbacon@pir.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 5:04 AM To: Chuck <consult@cgomes.com>; gnso-rds-pdp-5@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gnso-rds-pdp-5] DT5 Deliverable for ICANN Contractual Compliance Both docs look good to me, Chuck. Thank you for pulling all of our comments and edits. Safe travels all and see you in a few days. -Beth From: Gnso-rds-pdp-5 [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-5-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 8:14 PM To: gnso-rds-pdp-5@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-5@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rds-pdp-5] DT5 Deliverable for ICANN Contractual Compliance Importance: High Here is proposed final version of our deliverable for the ICANN Contractual Compliance Purpose. If anyone objects to anything in this version, please communicate what you object to and why not later than 1700 UTC (12 on EST, 9 am PST) tomorrow (Wednesday, March 7). If no objections are communicated, I will send it to the WG list. If any objections are communicated, I will note those in the final version and send that version to the WG list. Thanks to everyone for the thought you put into this. We still need to identify someone to present our final version in the WG meeting on Saturday morning; in that session other DT5 members may add their comments and WG members and guests will be given an opportunity to discuss it. Keeping in mind that this exercise is intended to help us continue our deliberation on whether the Regulatory Purpose is a legitimate purpose for processing any RDS data, the answers we give, and any objections will hopefully contribute to that deliberation when we get to it. Note that I did not include the comments from Beth and Kathy because I think they were mostly for understanding of the task. Please feel free to bring them up in F2F meeting if you think they will help. Chuck