I looked it up I am also fine with that. It gives the broader view. Please do so steve am happy we have such a wonderful team Kris
On 1 Nov 2017, at 07:59, <consult@cgomes.com> <consult@cgomes.com> wrote:
Thanks Steve. I think it would be helpful for you to add the payment processors example so that the rest of the team can see it and express their opinion.
Chuck
From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met@msk.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:17 PM To: 'consult@cgomes.com' <consult@cgomes.com>; 'Kris Seeburn' <seeburn.k@gmail.com>; GNSO-RDS-pdp-5@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gnso-rds-pdp-5] Update to the document we worked on
Thanks Kris and Chuck. As there was still a lot of overlap in the drafts I have edited them further to distinguish between governmental enforcement of regulations and private (including ICANN) enforcement of contracts/licenses.
It is unfortunate that these texts don’t include the payment processors use case identified by WG members last year (see https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/60493753/14-WHOIS%20queries...) , which falls on the contractual side. In the interests of time I have left that aside for now but perhaps that could be added in later.
I hope both of you are enjoying Abu Dhabi. I plan to participate remotely in tomorrow’s WG session.
Steve
Steven J. Metalitz | Partner, through his professional corporation T: 202.355.7902 | met@msk.com Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | www.msk.com 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.
From: gnso-rds-pdp-5-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-5-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of consult@cgomes.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:46 PM To: 'Kris Seeburn'; GNSO-RDS-pdp-5@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-5] Update to the document we worked on
I made what I think are minor edits to the Regulatory purpose document.
Chuck
From: Kris Seeburn [mailto:seeburn.k@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 6:32 AM To: GNSO-RDS-pdp-5@icann.org Cc: Chuck <consult@cgomes.com> Subject: Update to the document we worked on
Dear all,
I had originally revisited the document we had been working on and had a briefing with Chuck back and forth and we have now broken the document in two as per attached. Your comments are welcomed to improve. If you think we need to add more comprehension to the whole document perhaps one way to revisit is if you want to extrapolate or enlarge the definitions, we might add an appendix to those two documents. Just a suggestion.
Here they are and it is not on googledocs yet and i think Beth is a very good expert on that :) I am sure we are closer to what the comments were but we are a team and i’ll work along the lines of the team work.
