Perfect! On 4/6/2016 1:15 PM, Lisa Phifer wrote:
Great Kathy - I'll put your name down next to both the Global Tables book and article, ok?
At 11:03 AM 4/6/2016, Kathy Kleiman via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
Thank you, Lisa, I think the individuals articles are important to point out separately from the whole book. Would you like me to summarize them? Best, Kathy
On 4/6/2016 12:58 PM, Lisa Phifer via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
Thanks Stephanie. I had noticed that Kathy suggested the same Greenleaf book that you had, but thought it important to add the article about the tables also cited by Kathy. That's why the checklist contains both:
* Global Tables (2015, abstract and PDF download here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603502 <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603502>) and
* Article about the Global Tables (2015, abstract and PDF download here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603529 <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603529>)
Please let me know if that doesn't clear up the apparent redundancy. No doubt it would be useful for the same person to review/summarize both together for the privacy team, since the article discusses recent updates to the table and the trends behind them.
FYI, Greenleaf's 2014 book is available commercially as an e-book - see https://books.google.com/books?id=0eAuBQAAQBAJ <https://books.google.com/books?id=0eAuBQAAQBAJ> . Since we don't have public access to it, perhaps you could summarize the chapter you found useful? Doing that now would at least help the WG remember this resource exists when the time comes for detailed analysis of privacy laws.
Best, Lisa
At 09:23 AM 4/6/2016, Stephanie Perrin via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
Thanks Lisa, there is a redundancy, in that the global table I sent you (SSRN article by Greenleaf) is the same as the one Kathy resent which appears below it. In his 2014 book on asian privacy laws, which I did not send as it is hardcover only, there is an excellent chapter on how to evaluate/compare privacy laws, which has always been a puzzle for WHOIS discussions. I could summarize that but probably not distribute a scanned copy, however graham is a great advocate for access so if interested I could pester him and see if he has an electronic version. cheers stephanie
On 2016-04-06 10:39, Lisa Phifer via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
Hello all,
Today's updated privacy team checklist (attached) was just posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/p4xlAw <https://community.icann.org/x/p4xlAw>
Just follow the link above if you're looking for the latest daily update of any team's checklist.
In today's checklist update, to make it clearer which docs are not yet assigned, I have removed the ? names from the "Reviewed by" column. As you can see, there are still plenty of docs identified by this team over the past week or so that could still use volunteers to review them. For those not certain how much work is involved: summaries should be concise - for example, "executive summaries" that point the WG to the portions of the document most relevant to RDS privacy and why.
Best, Lisa
At 11:49 AM 4/5/2016, David Cake via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
Please find attached a summary of the proposed plan to finish the sub-teams input summarising work as presented on todays call. Weâ?Td like to get this document summarising work done (of course, we know other relevant documents may be published from here on, but we can handle those as the come) so we can get back to full WG mode and start proceeding with the rest of the work plan.
So what we are asking of you now is:
Please look at the input checklist provided, choose at least one input (ideally one that has not been looked at yet) that you are wiling to summarise, and email the whole group to let them know that you are working on it. Aim to have these summaries done by Monday. Please try to do this by the end of Wednesday.
This doesnâ?Tt mean that we are necessarily done with identification of new inputs - if you have someone else valuable to add, feel free to continue to do so. But the focus should now be on summarising what we have.
David
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy>