Hi,ALL MY EXCUSES FOR MY MULTIPLE ABSENCES. I am going through a period that does not allow to be available for these meetings but the period will pass. However, I am trying to follow the evolution of the debates. Warm regards and keep up the great work. -Olevie- 2017-04-05 8:47 GMT+00:00 Farell Folly <farellfolly@gmail.com>:
Thanks Lisa for the update,
Dear All, I apologize, haven't been able to attend the call
Le mar. 4 avr. 2017 à 18:36, Lisa Phifer <lisa@corecom.com> a écrit :
*Dear all,*
*Below please find notes from today’s RDS PDP WG meeting.*
*To recap action items:*
- *Action Item #1:* Staff to reflect proposed agreement on specific purpose 1) and decision to defer discussion on purpose 5) in Working Draft. - *Action Item #2:* Staff to test support using a poll (*not this week but but after "authoritive" is defined by WG - see below*) for the split purposes, using the term "access" and a footnote re: "authoritative" - *Action Item #3: *WG volunteers to come up with a proposed definintion of "authoritative" for use by the RDS, to be reviewed by the WG in next week's call: Andrew Sullivan, David Cake, Michael Palage - *Action Item #4*: All WG members to prepare for deliberation on charter question on Data Elements by reviewing Andrew Sullivan's proposal <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076964/Sullivan-Suggestio...> , Annex D of the EWG final report <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/EWG-AnnexD-ThinDat...> (thin data only), Merged-ThinDataPurposes-v1.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/Merged-ThinDataPur...>, and Section 3.1 of KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-7March2017.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliber...>
*There will be NO POLL this week.*
*Best regards,* *Lisa*
*Notes RDS PDP WG Meeting – 4 April 2017:*
*These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/sMLRAw <https://community.icann.org/x/sMLRAw>*
*1) *Roll Call/SOI Updates/New Member Intros
· Attendance will be taken from AC
· Please remember to state your name before speaking and remember to mute your microphones when not speaking
· SOI Updates: none
· Several new Members joining or upgrading from Observer in the past two weeks - see https://community.icann.org/x/I4xlAw
· Calls and polls are open only to Members; to upgrade from Observer to Member (or join), email gnso-secs@icann.org directly
*2) *Review 28 March Poll on Purpose results:
· See SummaryResults-Poll-on-Purpose-from-28MarchCall.pdf
· 38 respondents
*Q2: Alternatives to "1) A purpose of gTLD registration data is to provide information about the lifecycle of a domain name."*
· Alternative C has the greatest support (28) and least opposition (6), although probably not strong enough to be rough consensus
*Proposed Agreement (not quite rough consensus): * *A purpose of gTLD registration data is to provide information about the lifecycle of a domain name and its resolution on the Internet.*
*Action Item #1:* Staff to reflect proposed agreement on specific purpose 1) and decision to defer discussion on purpose 5) in Working Draft.
*Q3: Alternatives to "2) A purpose of RDS is to provide an authoritative source of information about, for example, domain contacts , domain names and name servers for gTLDs, [based on approved policy]." *
· More diversity in results, quite a lot of opposition - hard to reach a conclusion
· Comments 5 & 6 propose a new alternative which is more concise: A purpose of RDS is to facilitate *possible *dissemi nation of gTLD registration data in accordance with applicable policy. (possible added by Chuck)
· Comment: Either an RDS disseminates data, or it does not. WHAT data is as per policy.
· Alternative C and D (above) are fundamentally different
· Disagreement with adding "possible" - consider Alternative D: A purpose of RDS is to provide an authoritative source of information about, for example, domain contacts, domain names and name servers for gTLDs, [based on approved policy].
· Parsing this into collection, storage, and used as a source for access or disseminated - does this blend two or more purposes?
· A purpose is to provide an authoritative source... separate from (2) A purpose is to facilitate dissemination....
· Concern over term "dissemination" - implies push out or publish - suggest alternative "provide access to"
· Caveat with 1) is WG still needs a common understanding of what is meant by "authoritative" as used by the RDS PDP WG recommendations
· Definition of "authoritative" as per the "thick" WHOIS PDP: ""Authoritative, withrespect to provision of Whois services, shall be interpreted as to signify the single database within ahierarchical database structure holding the data that is assumed to be the final authority regardingthe question of which record shall be considered accurate and reliable in case of conflicting records;administered by a single administrative [agent] and consisting of data provided by the registrants ofrecord through their registrars."
· Another specific use of "authoritative" is within the RDAP RFCs - either we use the term consistently as there or we use a different term to reflect what we mean
· Chat: authoritative data is _by definition_ accurate in the sense that it's the real data, but it is not accurate in the sense of capturing the world
· See also https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/ reconsideration-17-1-smith-request-2017-03-16-en[icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...>
*Action Item #2:* Staff to test support using a poll (*not this week but rather after "authoritive" is defined by WG - see below*) for the split purposes, using the term "access" and a footnote re: "authoritative."
· (2a) A purpose is to provide an authoritative source... ( footnote "authoritative")
· (2b) A purpose is to provide access to...
*Action Item #3: *WG volunteers to come up with a proposed definintion of "authoritative" for use by the RDS, to be reviewed by the WG in next week's call: Andrew Sullivan, David Cake, Michael Palage
*Q4: Alternatives to "5) A purpose of RDS policy is to facilitate the accuracy of gTLD registration data."*
· Five (5) respondents suggested deleting this purpose entirely
· Equal levels of support for Altenatives A and C ( difference is whether or not to include footnote) 22 in support, 8 opposed for both
· Possibly table further discussion on "accuracy" until we get to the accuracy conversation
· Questions regarding active participation of RDS in accuracy, charter tasks WG with defining accuracy requirements and policy but the RDS may or may not be an active participant - it may improve accuracy without being actively involved (in a new RDS system where privacy is protected, more accurate data may be entered because registrants are less afraid of doing so)
· Red/Green poll on deletion produced very mixed results
· Proposal: Lacking clear direction, and unlikely to get clear direction from poll, retain Alternative A for now, include clear notation there is divergence on this, and revisit later
· Alternative (resolution for now) is placeholder: " Accuracy as it pertains to the RDS will be defined later in this PDP (see Charter question on Accuracy)."
*3)* Review updated Work Plan: *https://community.icann.org/x/oIxlAw <https://community.icann.org/x/oIxlAw>*
· A few potential target dates have been set:
· 12.a) Started deliberation on all 3 questions
· Starting data elements today (4 April)
· 12.b) Starting "thick data" by 2 May for those same questions
· 13.a) Goal from last week: 28 October (ICANN60 Abu Dabi meeting start)
· Need to plot a timeline to progress from 12a/b to 13
*4) *Proposed approaches to define purposes for each data element:
· See Section 3 of KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft- 7March2017.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliber...> and Sullivan-SuggestionForPurposeInDetail.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076964/Sullivan-Suggestio...> and Annex D of EWG Final Report <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf>
· Intent of suggestion was to provide a working example of how to approach matching purposes across "thin" data elements, taking into consideration EWG final report and the information provided by the privacy experts at ICANN58
· Put together a matrix that ties data elements to each purpose already addressed, or yet to be addressed ( iterative process) - create very specific purposes for collection of data elements
· Be sure to keep in mind work done and recommendations in the EWG final report while deliberating purpose now
· Refer to purposes listed for each data element in Annex D of the EWG final report <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/EWG-AnnexD-ThinDat...> (thin data only)
· Next week, we will deliberate on this under charter question on Data Elements, see section 3.1
· Plan for next week is to go through "thin" data elements one by one, and use purposes recommended in the EWG final report as a starting point of discussion
· "Sanity check": Develop consensus on purposes for thin data, and ensure that they do not conflict with local privacy/data protection laws (example: GDPR) - Intent of suggestion by Andrew Sullivan is to address purpose for each data elements being collected to mitigate concerns raised by privacy experts at ICANN58 on GDPR
*Action Item #4*: All WG members to prepare for deliberation on charter question on Data Elements by reviewing Andrew Sullivan's proposal <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076964/Sullivan-Suggestio...> , Annex D of the EWG final report <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/EWG-AnnexD-ThinDat...> (thin data only), Merged-ThinDataPurposes-v1.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/Merged-ThinDataPur...>, and Section 3.1 of KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-7March2017.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliber...>
*5) *Confirm action items and proposed decision points
· *Action Item #1:* Staff to reflect proposed agreement on specific purpose 1) and decision to defer discussion on purpose 5) in Working Draft.
· *Action Item #2:* Staff to test support using a poll (*not this week but but after "authoritive" is defined by WG - see below*) for the split purposes, using the term "access" and a footnote re: "authoritative"
· *Action Item #3: *WG volunteers to come up with a proposed definintion of "authoritative" for use by the RDS, to be reviewed by the WG in next week's call: Andrew Sullivan, David Cake, Michael Palage
· *Action Item #4*: All WG members to prepare for deliberation on charter question on Data Elements by reviewing Andrew Sullivan's proposal <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076964/Sullivan-Suggestio...> , Annex D of the EWG final report <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/EWG-AnnexD-ThinDat...> (thin data only), Merged-ThinDataPurposes-v1.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/Merged-ThinDataPur...>, and Section 3.1 of KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-7March2017.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliber...>
*Proposed Agreement (not quite rough consensus) for Specific Purpose 1) * *1) A purpose of gTLD registration data is to provide information about the lifecycle of a domain name and its resolution on the Internet.*
*Decision Point for Specific Purpose 5)**Defer discussion by replacing with a placeholder: "[Accuracy as it pertains to the RDS will be defined later in this PDP (see Charter question on Accuracy).]" *
*6) *Confirm next meeting date: 11 April, 2017 at 16:00 UTC
*Meeting Materials (all posted at https://community.icann.org/x/sMLRAw <https://community.icann.org/x/sMLRAw>**)*
· *Merged-ThinDataPurposes-v1.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/Merged-ThinDataPur...> *(initial rough draft displayed during call)
· *Sullivan-SuggestionForPurposeInDetail.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076964/Sullivan-SuggestionForPurposeInDetail.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1490583766000&api=v2>* and *doc <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076964/Sullivan-SuggestionForPurposeInDetail.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1490583779000&api=v2>*
· *KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-7March2017.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliber...> * and *doc <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-7March2017.docx?version=3&modificationDate=1489036982656&api=v2>*
· *Annex D of the EWG final report <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/EWG-AnnexD-ThinDat...> (thin data only)* - excerpted from full *EWG Final Report <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf>*
· *Latest RDS PDP WG Phase 1 Work Plan - as of April 2017 <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986784/RDS%20PDP%20WG%20Work%20Plan%20-%20Clean%203%20April%202017.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1491239583533&api=v2>* (posted 3 April 2017)
· *28MarchCall Poll on Purpose -*
o Link to participate:* Poll closed on 1 April*
o PDF of Poll Questions:* Poll-on-Purpose-from-28MarCall.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076964/Poll-on-Purpose-from-28MarCall.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1490794620000&api=v2>*
o SurveyMonkey PDF of Summary Poll Results: *SummaryResults-Poll-on-Purpose-from-28MarchCall.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/SummaryResults-Poll-on-Purpose-from-28MarchCall.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1491150106000&api=v2>*
o SurveyMonkey Zip of Poll Raw Results: *RawResults-Poll-on-Purpose-from-28MarchCall.zip <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/RawData-Poll-on-Pu...> *
o Annotated Results: *AnnotatedResultsForACDisplay-Poll-28MarchCall.pdf <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/AnnotatedResultsForACDisplay-Poll-28MarchCall.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1491257793000&api=v2>*
_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-- Regards @__f_f__
PhD Candidate, Universität der Bundeswehr München Computer Security | Internet of Things about.me/farell
_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-- *Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI* *Président/CEO de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut des TIC pour le développement) ** http://www.intic4dev.org/* Membre du Conseil d'Administration du FOSSFA *Eminent National Expert for the World Summit Award (http://www.wsis-award.org <http://www.wsis-award.org>) * *Secrétaire Général de l'ESTETIC - Association Togolaise des professionnels des TIC (http://www.estetic.tg <http://www.estetic.tg>)* *ICANN-GNSO-NCSG-NPOC-ExCom (http://www.npoc.org/ <http://www.npoc.org/>) **ICANN - Fellow & Alumni (http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>) - Membre de Internet Society (http://www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org>)-**Membre fondateur du RIK-Togo (Réseau Interprofessionnel du Karité au Togo) *( http://www.globalshea.com) *Skype : olevie1 FaceBook : @olivier.kouami.7 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo*