Thanks Tapani. That makes sense to me. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of 'Tapani Tarvainen' Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2018 12:52 PM To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Krebs On Security article RE whois and GDRP On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 10:17:04AM -0800, consult@cgomes.com (consult@cgomes.com) wrote:
Trying to protect non-European natural persons dealing with European companies seems reasonable to me, but I don't understand how the GDPR could protect non-European natural persons dealing with non-European companies.
It can't. EU does not claim jurisdiction in that situation. People outside EU will benefit from GDPR directly only when dealing with European companies. My apologies if I was unclear. Tapani
-----Original Message----- From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Tapani Tarvainen Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 1:06 PM To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Krebs On Security article RE whois and GDRP
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:52:51AM -0800, John Horton via gnso-rds-pdp-wg (gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org) wrote:
But we're seeing the registrar community say: We want to apply this globally. To all domain name registrations. Doesn't matter if the registrant is the intended beneficiary of the new law, or in scope, or not.
Intended beneficiaries of the GDPR are all the people in the world.
The recitals make that quite clear.
In particular EU wants to protect also non-European individuals against European companies even if that would mean giving competitive advantage to non-European companies, strange though that may seem to some.
-- Tapani Tarvainen
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg