Thanks Alan. Bears some discussion, especially in light of the several dependencies the GNSO Council has forked. -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
I don't think that this message has yet been forwarded to this group. If it was and I missed it, I apologize for the duplication.
In summary, It had been suggested that the upcoming RDS Review be limited to a review of whether the last WHOIS Review Recommendations had been implemented. The intent was to limit the ongoing work on RDS issues and relive the stress of those actively participating.
The GNSO has now indicated that although they want to avoid duplication, they would want a far more extensive review.
I beleive that we need to discuss this.
Alan
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>
Subject: Re: RDS Review Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:42:53 +0000
Dear Karen and Community Leaders –
The GNSO Council, working with its component Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, has produced this document (attached), which outlines our feedback and concerns with the proposed “limited scope†for the upcoming RDS review. The document was submitted to ICANN Staff, and sharing with this team for your reference.
Thank you,
J. ---------------- James Bladel GNSO Chair
_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg