Correct. Note that this is the GNSO RDS PDP WG. Chuck From: Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 11:23 AM To: Sivasubramanian M Cc: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org Subject: RE: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list ) From: isolatedn@gmail.com<mailto:isolatedn@gmail.com> [mailto:isolatedn@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sivasubramanian M Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 11:22 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott Cc: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list ) Who are the policy makers in the multi-stakeholder framework? Why not ICANN pay attention, at least to facilitate discussion on this topic? I think that’s what we’re doing here… Scott