Okay Chuck. @Lisa, referring to my previous e-mail and in order to continue processing with the pending documents, I will take this one as my second : White Paper: Management of Internet Names and Addresses, Statement of Policy (2012) Le 31 mai 2016 15:12, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> a écrit :
Farell,
You are correct that the ‘new private not-for-profit organization’ is ICANN.
Chuck
*From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Farell Folly *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:13 AM *To:* RDS PDP WG *Subject:* [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List of Possible requirements from Green Paper: Improvement of Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses (1998)
Hello All,
In attach three files containing three categories (registries, registrars, Trademarks and dispute resolution) of requirements. I must add that the document was created in 1998 when US government intended to transfer the mangement of the database from IANA to a new private not-for-profit organization (I think this is now ICANN, right?) and may be most of the requirements have been taken into account somewhere between 1998 and 2012, before the EWG report. I just want to bring your attention on that.
@Lisa, I Haven't named all the requirements yet. What I've just done is, for instance, to write *[DE-xx-yy] , [DP-xx-yy] for requirements which address Data Elements and Data Privacy. I will update xx as soon as the document cited in the mail object is added to Annex A.*
Best regards,
@__f_f__