Mark, Greg, et. al., In an effort to keep things both simple and clear, /might not "Camp #2" below simply be a specific example of those in Camp #1/ who want data to be "provided/available" under restricted conditions. Maybe the Camp #1 wording could be further tuned to say "... Various stakeholders may have different and distinct requirements..." This replaces "..have similar yet distinct requirements..." and inserts a conditional "may" in front of "have". Sam L. On 8/22/2016 6:43 PM, Mark Svancarek wrote:
Resending – I see that the current draft has some changes which obscure the original 2-camps distinction.
Camp #1:
/Consumers, the domain name industry, governments, and intellectual property owners, and individual registrants all have a vested interest in an RDS system which contains accurate and complete registration data…. These stakeholders have similar yet distinct requirements regarding the particular data which should be collected and the conditions under which it can be viewed. /
Camp #2:
/Additionally, there are some entities which desire anonymity for free speech and personal safety reasons, and their requirements regarding data collection and data access may be at odds with the aforementioned stakeholders. /
/msv