Could we have a brief explanation of why RDAP is the better protocol of them all? (A really short summary would do) Nathalie Coupet On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:03 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote: If we decide that an RDDS is needed, we’re going to have to find a way to provide that service using one of the options (WHOIS, WHOIS++, RWHOIS, IRIS, or RDAP) that are already available. RDAP is our best option. +1. Confession. My interest in these matters always cleave to the end game. So I have spent a lot of time digging and was lucky enough to be tutored some. [Largely by Scott in an EWG subteam.] On the balance of the evidence and given the endgame, I am unanimous that for a functional RDDS with a certain form to it, RDAP and its evolution seems our best bet to address all the known registration data issues and to project a globally-acceptable framework here forward. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= _______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg