I always trust Chris Pounder, who has a more nuanced evaluation of what is at risk. I agree that while the Privacy Act is not central to the shield, it remains important to the overall assessment of adequacy, and punching the hole in it through the EO undermines the Shield because of the increased potential for data sharing. http://amberhawk.typepad.com/amberhawk/ Stephanie Perrin On 2017-01-31 17:39, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
Some would disagree:
http://www.hlmediacomms.com/2017/01/31/trumps-executive-order-does-not-impac...
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
*From: *<gnso-rds-pdp-privacy-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> *Date: *Tuesday 31 January 2017 at 22:30 *To: *Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy <gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org>, RDS WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> *Subject: *[Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Privacy Rights of Non US Citizens
Um, well, the waters are roiled even more.....
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20170130_executive_order_and_the_new_date_priv...
See the full text of the EO here <https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/25/presidential-executiv...>, refer Sec 14.
-Carlton
============================== /Carlton A Samuels/ /Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround/ =============================
_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg