Hi everyone and welcome Steve, In my own view, I think we have actually been using the RDAP protocol as the basis for our discussions thus far, and in the anticipation of the added functionality that RDAP offers, this has subsequently informed a lot of the lengthy debate around the different datasets, purposes, requirements etc. I echo the sentiment expressed by both Steve and Michele that we should continue to design future RDS policy with a fresh mindset, whilst acknowledging and closely scrutinising our ideas in accordance with legal frameworks and operational requirements. Its definitely a very complicated task, but I think we’re doing that, and credit to everyone for their amazing dedication thus far. Whatever the outcome, I think the most important thing is that we work through the process in a spirit of mutual respect and polite attitude at all times. Kind regards, Nick Nick Shorey Phone: +44 (0) 7552 455 988 Email: lists@nickshorey.com Skype: nick.shorey Twitter: @nickshorey LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/nicklinkedin Web: www.nickshorey.com
On 14 Feb 2018, at 17:50, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
Steve
Welcome to the WG – so now we know the answer to the question about what happens to ICANN Board Chairs when they step down ..
On a more serious note – I don’t disagree, but unfortunately a lot of our time and energy has been wasted with arguments that cling to the “status quo”. Unless that attitude changes dramatically it’ll be hard to make progress in a timely fashion.
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ <https://www.blacknight.com/> http://blacknight.blog/ <http://blacknight.blog/> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ <https://michele.blog/> Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ <https://ceo.hosting/> ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> Date: Wednesday 14 February 2018 at 16:27 To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Using the GDPR as a basis for RDS Policy is backwards
I am only partially up to speed on the state of discussion within this WG, but I have been following the RDS situation for several years. In my view, the current focus on GDPR, while understandable because of the looming deadline, is logically backwards. The challenge, which we tried to address forcefully in 2012, is to rethink the RDS from the ground up. In my view, this is: <>
o necessary
o feasible
o will lead to a much cleaner model
o will make it relatively straightforward to satisfy the GDPR and all similar regulations around the world.
There are also some issues such as the relationship of name server operators that also need to be addressed.
There is obviously much more that needs to be said. I will contribute as much and as quickly as I can.
Steve
_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg