Rob: the professionals in that area disagree. Reference for example: http://docs.apwg.org/reports/apwg-ipc_Advisory_WhoisDataForPhishingSiteTakeD... It's a document in the WG reference list. Like I said earlier, it's not the proper time to debate the merits of the various "possible requirements." All best, --Greg -----Original Message----- From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Rob Golding Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:54 AM To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: Notes from today's RDS PDP WG meeting
Safeguard 3: Should Registry Operators undertake periodic security checks to analyze whether domains in its gTLD are being used for threats to security, such as pharming, phishing, malware and botnets?
None of which requires "registration" data ... pharming = content phishing = content malware = content botnets = traffic [and are primarily ip based not domain based] etc Rob _______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg