Dear all, Please find the MP3 and Adobe Connect recording for the GNSO Review Working Group held on 23 February 2017 at 13:00 UTC MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-23feb17-en.mp3 Adobe Connect Recording: <https://participate.icann.org/p1wev5gj38q/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=d2bb332eb83bd37e 112e25e7751c52e54fb922234e519726f89516ceebbbd6db> https://participate.icann.org/p1wev5gj38q/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group -2Dactivities_calendar&d=DQMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5c M&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=xZIJEMTVQJAaGhrSEs-mGNP1af 5ZhtLo5tjqyJUr5j4&s=zi8HqkcJPzyRZtbiQ-TlsxBQhcExCdcb-3Ezk1dDjec&e=> Mailing list archives: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/ZhmsAw Attendees: Members: Heath Dixon (RrSG Primary) Sara Bockey (RrSG Alternate) Jennifer Wolfe (RySG Primary) Donna Austin (RySG Alternate) Rafik Dammak (NCSG Primary) Avri Doria (NCSG (alternate) Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (ISPCP) Osvaldo Novoa (ISPCP) Participants: Renata Aquino Ribeiro (NCUC) Apologies: Lori Schulman ICANN staff: Marika Konings Julie Hedlund Negar Farzinnia Berry Cobb Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 23 February 2017 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the GNSO Review WG Kick-Off Meeting on Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes Terri Agnew:agenda wiki page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_v 6HRAw <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_ v6HRAw&d=DwICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpC IgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=x5p02eNgvidHFy-KF4vnbbzWJiSMsphJQW4ZY3-RJh s&s=fKymFxWpyRH3eZjx4NJFIZRZl3ostGgjMgwCmYCqUvs&e> &d=DwICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=x5p02eNgvidHFy-KF4vnbbzWJiSMsphJQW4ZY3-RJhs&s=fK ymFxWpyRH3eZjx4NJFIZRZl3ostGgjMgwCmYCqUvs&e= Rafik:hi all Julie Hedlund:Hello everyone and welcome! Terri Agnew:Welcome Renata Aquino Ribeiro Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Hi thanks Terri Agnew:Welcome Donna Austin Heath Dixon:I'm not seeing the next slides. Julie Hedlund:@Heath -- you might need to refresh your adobe connect room. Terri Agnew:@Heath, try another browser Heath Dixon:Have we decided on this time? Julie Hedlund:@Heath: We did ask when people filled in the poll to consider whether this might be a recurring time, but can discuss that. avri doria:pardon my multple entries. somehow i have to reboot my computer everytime i start AC or i lose sound. BTW why doesn't GNSO calls have the call back mechanism activated that At Large calls have. Heath Dixon:QUESTION: So what does that mean to do both phases at the same time? FOr example, in the first meeting, will the agenda be to move through as many of the Phase 1 items as possible, or to move through a fixed number of those? Terri Agnew:@Avri, most At-Large adobe connect rooms are set up similiar to this GNSO room. What At-Large call did you join with a call back feature? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I'd second Heath's question Donna Austin, Neustar:I have a conflict at the ICANN meeting Sara Bockey:I'm good with every other week. How long will the meetings be? Sorry if I missed it. Early here Heath Dixon:COMMENT: I'm fine with every other week, but would prefer 14:00 UTC to 13:00 UTC. Julie Hedlund:@Sara: I think the meetings would be 60 minutes. Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes 15d is good Julie Hedlund:@Heath: We can do another doodle poll. Sara Bockey:great! Donna Austin, Neustar:I would also prefer 1400 UTC avri doria:this time slot will occasionally conflict with ws2 Renata Aquino Ribeiro:doodle poll is best Heath Dixon:COMMENT: I can't attend ICANN 58 but will participate remotely. avri doria:we should avoid the 3 WS2 time tracks Julie Hedlund:@Jen: Will do a poll for the week of 27 March. Renata Aquino Ribeiro:good Julie Hedlund:@Avri -- noted! Heath Dixon:Can only read part of slide Renata Aquino Ribeiro:(had to be w/out sound for a while, hopefully will get it back soon and trying to follow anyway) Heath Dixon:Can we change slide proportion so it's all on screen? Terri Agnew:everyone can scroll themselves Heath Dixon:THere. That fixed it. Heath Dixon:QUESTION: Heath Dixon:I think it's better if we answer the question later. Heath Dixon:SOrry. Heath Dixon:QUESTION: For the ones where work remains to be done, do we decide what work is to be done at the Charter stage, or does the Charter simply indicate the proposed Implementation Steps and then the people working on the Recommendation decide the work? Trying to understand how much work (and decision-making needs to happen at the Charter stage versus the Working stage. Heath Dixon:OK, if you can't here me I'll type. Please continue while I ype. Terri Agnew:@Heath, your mic isn't active, please active your mic or provide me a telephone number and the op can dial out on the telephone Terri Agnew:to active your mic, top tool bar, select the telephone icon and follow the prompts Heath Dixon:COMMENT: "The background of each of these is..." This is the point I was trying to make with my first question a minute ago. To me, where the information is the same for each, and where it's already in the plan, seems unnecessary to repeat it all here. Heath Dixon:Exactly right. Heath Dixon:COMMENT: Also, if there are areas in these documents that are N/A for all (or most), seems like we should pull those out to streamline. THe longer these are, the more time they demand from people trying to read them and understand what we're doing. Heath Dixon:RE: Portfolio - exactly. Marika Konings:so the proposed solution already happened? It may be worth to make that clearer. Marika Konings:so not 'proposed' but 'Solution applied' or something like that? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:apologies, dropping off the call, will check recording and follow up on list Heath Dixon:COMMENT: For all of these, we need to answer the question: "What else needs to be done after the proposed solution is implemented?" Presumably we should not need to do anything else, but the GNSO may need to monitor, report, periodically review and decide whether to make changes, etc. For ones where work is being done elsewhere, the question is: Do we trust those WGs to include follow-up? Or do we want to interject our own follow-up? Heath Dixon:COMMENT: On the time-to-review point, I would be happy to see these roll out as ICANN Staff completes the first drafts, rather than waiting to get them in a batch. It will be easier for me to review them one at a time. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:agree to Heath Heath Dixon:Julie, et al., thank you for the work! Rafik:well it is late in Asia :) Sara Bockey:thanks all Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks and good bye! avri doria:bye