Hi Ariel, I think the language below can be read both ways - showing the questions and not showing the questions. But the whole reason for the work over the weekend, with Kurt's text as revised by Rebecca, was to *not* show questions that the subteam has yet to even review :-). Hence, our work for this week! Best regards, Kathy On 1/23/2018 6:11 PM, Ariel Liang wrote:
Hello Kathy,
Thank you for your comments.
In last week’s Sub Team call, when you raised the question whether to release the draft suggested survey questions for Section 4 and 5 (Section 6 does not have any suggested questions yet), Kurt responded that he was comfortable with either hiding them, or releasing them with important caveats. The language (bolded below) in the paragraphs provided by Kurt and commented by Rebecca and you seem to indicate that draft suggested survey questions should still be kept in the clean copy.
“…*The ICANN volunteer policy team developing registrant survey questions has only created the rough drafts*. Answers to *these questions* will inform the discussion of the Charter questions that you have read. ICANN staff and policy volunteers will continue to hone the*survey questions* during the vendor selection process and then will work with the selected survey provider to create a set of questions and methodology to economically and effectively elicit the requisite data.”
Kurt and others, please be so kind to confirm whether the draft suggested survey questions for Section 4 and 5 should be excluded from the document at this stage. If they should not be excluded, we will convert the clean copy incorporating the edits/comments received to date.
Thank you,
Ariel
*From: *Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com> *Date: *Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 11:05 AM *To: *"gnso-rpm-data@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Reminder: Google Doc Closes on Tue 23 Jan at 18:00 UTC
Hi Ariel,
I've checked the document and may be missing something. I thought the goal was to replace Questions 4, 5 and 6 (since the subteam has not yet discussed them) with the paragraphs that Kurt and Rebecca have drafted/edited.
/Is that your plan as well?/
I ask because I note the un-reviewed details and columns of questions of 4, 5 and 6 remain in the current document...
Best and tx, Kathy
On 1/22/2018 7:40 PM, Ariel Liang wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is a friendly reminder that staff will close “commenting/suggesting” on the Data Request Google doc[docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> by 18:00 UTC on Tuesday, 23 January. After the document is closed, staff will convert a clean version as is, circulate the clean document on the full WG mailing list, and incorporate it in the RFP document, noting the draft status of the document.
Thanks for the Registrant / Potential Registrant paragraphs drafted by Kurt and commented by Rebecca and Kathy. If anyone has further comments on the paragraphs, please provide your input ASAP.
Thank you!
Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-data mailing list
Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>