Dear all, Thanks to everyone who was able to fill out the Doodle poll. As we know that everyone’s calendars fill up pretty quickly, staff would like to take the opportunity to CONFIRM that the second Sub Team call will take place this Friday 20 October at 1600 UTC for 60 minutes. The Secretariat will send out the usual calendar invitation and call details shortly. This is in addition to the first call, which will take place in the regular Working Group time slot of 1600 UTC this Wednesday 18 October for 90 minutes. The Sub Team will also have a 90-minute session at ICANN60, probably on Saturday 28 October from 15.15-16.45 local time. Hopefully this will allow us to make good progress on the Sub Team tasks. You may also be interested to know that staff has begun the internal procurement process and hope to have an update for you and the Working Group on likely timelines and additional information needed (if any) soon. Cheers Mary From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Date: Monday, October 16, 2017 at 15:28 To: "gnso-rpm-data@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> Subject: Doodle poll for ADDITIONAL RPM Data Sub Team meeting Thanks to everyone who responded; in addition to repurposing the RPM Working Group call this Wednesday into a Data Sub Team meeting (for 90 minutes in the usual 1700 UTC time slot), we are trying to schedule another Sub Team meeting before people begin traveling to Abu Dhabi next week. Please fill in this Doodle poll so that we can see if doing an additional Sub Team meeting, on top of this Wednesday’s call and before ICANN60, is feasible: https://icannorg.doodle.com/poll/bcfcm4e7293xvd4f Thank you very much! Cheers Mary From: Lori Schulman <lschulman@inta.org> Date: Monday, October 16, 2017 at 08:48 To: Susan Payne <susan.payne@valideus.com>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: PLEASE READ: Next steps for RPM Data Sub Team Hi, I am happy to have a sub team session at ICANN60. I will be remote. I am not available for a subteam meeting this week or next. The week after ICANN is the INTA Leadership meeting so I am not available then either. I have 4 conferences in the next 3 weeks so scheduling will be super tough. I will dial in if I find myself free but it is unlikely. Lori Lori S. Schulman Senior Director, Internet Policy International Trademark Association (INTA) +1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman [17-esig] From: gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Payne Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 5:34 AM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>; gnso-rpm-data@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] PLEASE READ: Next steps for RPM Data Sub Team Thanks Mary 1. Sub Team meeting(s) next week I have no objection to using Wednesday’s call for a sub-team meeting, and do plan to be on the call, subject to the following: * This is/was going to be our last WG meeting before AD. I thought we were going to use some of the meeting to discuss the agendas for our AD meetings? If there won’t now be a WG meeting is it the intention that this happens on the list instead? * Similarly, I had rather assumed we would be reviewing the data staff have been collecting on the Claims, as we did for the Sunrise last week. If that is not the case, will we do this instead in AD? * I presume that this subgroup was set up, at least in part, because it is viewed as impractical to undertake the work through the full working group. With that in mind, if the WG meeting is to be repurposed I think it is important that there is a cancellation sent out as soon as possible. I have no objection to more members of the WG joining the sub-team call, but I’d prefer to see them join the call because they are willing to make a commitment to participating in the sub-team’s ongoing work, not because the fancy “observing” on a one-off occasion. Regarding Friday’s proposed call, again, I am available to join but I think we need to be clear how many people can actually make this time slot (which is inconveniently early for US W Coast) and will be able to actively participate (ie able to join the Adobe and able to speak) and assume “no response” is a no. It might be preferable to do a doodle poll and find a time which works better for people. 1. Sub Team session at ICANN60 I support spending time in AD actively progressing the sub-team’s work. I think most (although not all) of the volunteers will be present, and hopefully the non-attendees could join in Adobe if they are free – in which case the Saturday 17.00-18.30 might be the best, from a time zone perspective, although of course for a non-meeting attendee it is the weekend! Having said this, it looks as though the room allocated to the WG on Thursday may be significantly smaller than for the other sessions. Is that correct? If so, this would seem better suited to a sub-team meeting than to the full WG plus onlookers. Whichever slot is selected, could the ICANN schedule please be updated to make it clear that this is a sub-group working session. Of course it will still be open, should others like to attend, but it will not be conducive to getting the work done if people come in and out thinking they will get an update/overview on the work of the PDP. Thanks Susan Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd E: susan.payne@valideus.com<mailto:susan.payne@valideus.com> D: +44 20 7421 8255 T: +44 20 7421 8299 M: +44 7971 661175 From: gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: 13 October 2017 19:23 To: gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] PLEASE READ: Next steps for RPM Data Sub Team Dear Sub Team members, Following a meeting between the Working Group co-chairs and staff to prepare for ICANN60, we will be grateful if you can respond to the following questions as soon as possible: 1. Sub Team meeting(s) next week As the first Sub Team call today had to be canceled due to lack of attendance, the co-chairs are proposing to repurpose the Working Group meeting scheduled for Wednesday 18 October into a Sub Team call (with the agenda intended for the call today, below). This call will be open to all Working Group members to observe, but will allow the Sub Team a full 90 minutes to begin its work. In addition, the Sub Team can hold its second meeting next Friday 20 October, in the same time slot as today (i.e. 1400 UTC) for 60 minutes. This will allow the Sub Team to make as much progress as we can before the open community sessions take place in Abu Dhabi at ICANN60. As such, can you respond to let us know if you plan to attend the Wednesday 18 October as well as (if you agree to a second meeting) the Friday 20 October calls? 1. Sub Team session at ICANN60 The Working Group co-chairs also propose that one of the four Working Group sessions scheduled for ICANN60 be used for a Sub Team meeting. This will be an open session where other Working Group members and community participants can also attend. Ideally, this will be one of the two sessions scheduled for Saturday 28 October (either 15.15-16.45 or 17.00-18.30). Can you let us know if you will be attending any/some/all of the Working Group sessions at ICANN60, and whether you plan to do so in person or remotely? (Note: the other Working Group sessions are scheduled for Monday 30 October from 15.15-16.45, and Thursday 2 November from 13.30-15.00.) Thank you! Cheers Mary From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 23:48 To: "gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> Subject: Agenda for first meeting of RPM Data Sub Team Dear all, Thank you for volunteering to be on the new RPM Data Sub Team. In preparation for our first call on Friday 13 October, I hope you don’t mind staff taking the liberty of proposing the following agenda: 1. Roll call 2. Selection of Sub Team chair(s) 3. Review GNSO Council approval of Sunrise and Trademark Claims data request 4. Begin discussion of ideas and suggestions for refining and/or clarifying the objectives and scope of the Sunrise and Claims data request in light of the GNSO Council’s directions and the relevant Charter questions 5. Next steps/next meeting For Agenda Item #2, here is the link to the GNSO Council’s resolution approving the data request: https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20170920-1[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_resolutions-2320170920-2D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=icPCn1rHHLRP5Qz86ptzle_mXFAG9fzM8Yzva8cjljg&s=mEKdGCUszoV_--cyJIXogR3TcdPgnFRaRVafSSbfYKE&e=> For Agenda Item #3, here is the link to a copy of the data request as submitted to the Council: https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-sunrise-trademark-claims-07sep17-en.pdf[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_rpm-2Dsunrise-2Dtrademark-2Dclaims-2D07sep17-2Den.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=icPCn1rHHLRP5Qz86ptzle_mXFAG9fzM8Yzva8cjljg&s=TiExYgwmBIB1iIWxRrVpBoZ_xmSgJ5TI-ZNiJ-bULgE&e=> Thanks and cheers Mary
