Thanks for letting us know, Phil! Cyntia, Justine, and others, Would Thursday, 23 Aug 12:00-13:30 UTC work for you? Thank you, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry On Aug 16, 2018, at 2:53 PM, Corwin, Philip <pcorwin@verisign.com<mailto:pcorwin@verisign.com>> wrote: Sorry but I messed up on this, reading ET instead of UTC. I could do the Thursday 1200 UTC time but the Friday one is impossible for me. Philip S. Corwin Policy Counsel VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 703-948-4648/Direct 571-342-7489/Cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Payne Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 2:43 AM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Cc: gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] Providers Sub Team Call Next Week - Timing Thanks Ariel, either time is fine for me. Susan Sent from my iPad On 15 Aug 2018, at 22:02, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Providers Sub Team members, Staff would like to seek your advice on the timing to hold a call next week for the review of URS Providers’ and GDD’s responses to the follow-up questions. URS Providers and GDD are requested to respond by Monday, 20 August (MFSD and GDD have already submitted their responses, updated in tab 2 of the spreadsheet HERE [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreads...>). Assuming we will receive responses from ADNDRC and FORUM on time, it would be useful for the Sub Team to meet in order to identify issues and propose suggestions for the consideration by the full WG. To facilitate the review, staff would be happy to provide a document that summarizes findings/issues/divergence (in addition to the spreadsheet of full responses). ACTION: Please let us know which time slot you prefer to hold the call (90 minutes – 12:00 UTC is suggested to accommodate members outside North America): * Thursday, 23 August 12:00-13:30 UTC * Friday, 24 August 12:00-13:30 UTC Thank you for your time and consideration! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, Berry From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Date: Monday, August 6, 2018 at 7:09 PM To: "gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org>> Subject: Follow-up Questions to Providers & Other Sources Dear Providers Sub Team members, With support from the Co-Chair, staff have developed a list of follow up questions to URS Providers and other sources, including ICANN GDD, registries, and registers. Please find the list of follow-up questions attached. The follow-up questions were developed based on staff’s observation and understanding of the Sub Team’s review of the Providers’ responses. The row numbers in the chart corresponds to the row numbers in the spreadsheet of Providers’ responses [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreads...>. The target for the question is indicated with “x”. Please note the questions/draft emails to registries and/or registrars, which are highlighted in yellow, will not be sent out now. The reason is that the TMCH Sunrise & Claims surveys will be distributed to the registries and registrars next week. Additional questions related to the URS Providers issue may distract them from the TMCH surveys and hinder the response rate. In the interest of time, staff will be sending these questions to URS Providers and ICANN GDD now and request them to respond within two weeks (by Monday, 20 August). We hope their swift response would help facilitate the WG deliberation on issues identified by the Sub Team. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, Berry _______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-providers mailing list Gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-providers