Dear Providers Sub Team Members, By COB Friday (22 June), FORUM submitted supplemental responses to the remaining 20 questions that were pending responses, as well as a few questions that they already responded previously. Staff have updated the spreadsheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr...> of the consolidated responses (FORUM’s supplemental responses are highlighted in yellow). The presentation slide deck for ICANN62 working session have also been updated accordingly (please find attached). All responses and attachments submitted by Providers are uploaded on this page: https://community.icann.org/x/FBu8B. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> Date: Friday, June 22, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: "gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org> Subject: RE: How to Structure ICANN62 Session (mailing list seems to experience significant delay in delivering messages, and staff are re-sending this message without attaching the presentation slide deck but including a download link) Dear Providers Sub Team Members, To facilitate the working session on Thursday at ICANN62, staff have prepared a slide deck for Option B (please download here: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79436564/RPM_URS_PDP_WG_Ses...) . Hearing no input yet from the Sub Team about the structure of the session, staff would like to suggest that the Sub Team members focus on reviewing the questions with divergent responses, so that we could take advantage of the participation of all three URS Providers in the session. Please note that the slides only contain very high-level summary, key points, and quotes from Providers’ responses. The full responses should be referenced from the spreadsheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr...>. In addition, the slide deck also includes the questions that Sub Team already reviewed, as well as the follow up questions; some questions that have not received completed responses from one or more Providers are also included in the deck. If there is no significant objection to this approach, staff will inform the Providers about the format of the session and share the slide deck with them as a heads-up. Thank you, Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 11:42 AM To: "gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org> Subject: How to Structure ICANN62 Session Dear Providers Sub Team Members, Staff touched based with Co-Chairs earlier today to discuss ICANN62 session planning. Per Co-Chairs’ direction, we are seeking advice on how you wish to structure the working session in Panama (Thu, 28 June at 10:30-12:00 local time). Again, all three Providers will be attending the session either in person or remotely. If we may, staff would like to propose some suggestions: * The session would use an interaction format, with Q&A between the Sub Team members and the Providers. * There would be no formal presentations from the URS Providers; they are expected to provide further information/clarification, if needed, as the Sub Team goes through their responses. * Option A: * Sub Team will first ask the Providers to address the follow up questions developed in the previous call; * Sub Team will then pick up from where we left and continue going through the responses based on the order in the spreadsheet (starting from row 20); * Staff will display the spreadsheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr...> that contains the full responses from the Providers on the screen, with no additional slides. * Option B: * Sub Team will focus on reviewing the questions with divergent/different responses from the Providers (50 questions total); * Staff are happy to develop some slides (e.g., with high-level points summarizing the divergent responses for each question) to display on the screen to facilitate the discussions. However, Sub Team members should still reference the spreadsheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr...> on their own laptops for the full responses. At your earliest convenience, please be so kind to provide your preference for Option A or Option B, as well as additional ideas if any, so staff could relay the information/expectations to the Providers to assist their participation in the Sub Team working session at ICANN62. Thank you for your input! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry