Suggested List of Issues for Discussion - URS Providers Survey
Dear Providers Sub Team members, We hope you had a nice weekend. As per staff action item, please find attached the “Suggested List of Issues for Discussion – URS Providers Survey” in word and PDF format. The suggested list is developed based on staff’s observation and understanding of the Providers’ Sub Team review of the Providers Survey results. The list contains issues identified by the Sub Team for further discussion and as requested by the Sub Team, additional issues identified by staff based on the survey results. Findings/recommendations that appear suitable for presentation to the full Working Group are highlighted in green, and staff questions for the Sub Team have been highlighted in yellow (only three questions on page 6, 30, and 34). The issues and recommendations have been categorized using the same subheadings as in the “Consolidated URS Discussion Document<https://community.icann.org/x/zxW8B>” previously agreed by the full Working Group and being reviewed by the Documents Sub Team. Staff anticipates that the “Consolidated URS Discussion Document” will remain the frame of reference for Working Group deliberations following each of the Sub Teams’ reports. For the full responses from the Providers and additional details, please refer to the "Responses & Notes - URS Provider Questions<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr...>" spreadsheet. IMPORTANT: If you have any question or comment with regard to the suggested list, please send to the Sub Team mailing list by Wednesday, 30 July by 15:00 UTC. In that way, staff will be able to make revisions/edits to the document based on input received in time for the full WG meeting at 17:00 UTC. Thank you for your time and review! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry
*Correction: the deadline for submitting input and feedback should be Wednesday, 1 August by 15:00 UTC. Staff would recommend the Sub Team using this “Suggested List of Issue for Discussion” document as Sub Team’s report to the full WG during the Wednesday meeting. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry From: Gnso-rpm-providers <gnso-rpm-providers-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> Date: Monday, July 30, 2018 at 10:48 AM To: "gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-providers] Suggested List of Issues for Discussion - URS Providers Survey Dear Providers Sub Team members, We hope you had a nice weekend. As per staff action item, please find attached the “Suggested List of Issues for Discussion – URS Providers Survey” in word and PDF format. The suggested list is developed based on staff’s observation and understanding of the Providers’ Sub Team review of the Providers Survey results. The list contains issues identified by the Sub Team for further discussion and as requested by the Sub Team, additional issues identified by staff based on the survey results. Findings/recommendations that appear suitable for presentation to the full Working Group are highlighted in green, and staff questions for the Sub Team have been highlighted in yellow (only three questions on page 6, 30, and 34). The issues and recommendations have been categorized using the same subheadings as in the “Consolidated URS Discussion Document [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_zxW8B&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dRzB-YypMqj9AZjlP_sZHORJtVF4M6AI0vip1lbQy10&m=T0Ei0D7TJK8raeqNCg8x6nTyyV0Vj_nZ27EFQqykR2E&s=d7mXwTrvYT1iOCTb86vCodGCH4X6iMQwGALbO36kPPg&e=>” previously agreed by the full Working Group and being reviewed by the Documents Sub Team. Staff anticipates that the “Consolidated URS Discussion Document” will remain the frame of reference for Working Group deliberations following each of the Sub Teams’ reports. For the full responses from the Providers and additional details, please refer to the "Responses & Notes - URS Provider Questions [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreads...>" spreadsheet. IMPORTANT: If you have any question or comment with regard to the suggested list, please send to the Sub Team mailing list by Wednesday, 30 July by 15:00 UTC. In that way, staff will be able to make revisions/edits to the document based on input received in time for the full WG meeting at 17:00 UTC. Thank you for your time and review! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry
Thanks. This is extremely helpful as we move toward considering what if any changes should be made to URS policy or procedure. The one caution I’d make is that some of the issues need to be looked at from the perspective of different sub-teams. For example, the Providers are content with current word limits, while some Practitioners felt adjustments would be beneficial. I’m not advocating either position, just pointing out that there are some different perspectives, although nothing major that I’m aware of. Philip S. Corwin Policy Counsel VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 703-948-4648/Direct 571-342-7489/Cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Liang Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 10:57 AM To: gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] Suggested List of Issues for Discussion - URS Providers Survey *Correction: the deadline for submitting input and feedback should be Wednesday, 1 August by 15:00 UTC. Staff would recommend the Sub Team using this “Suggested List of Issue for Discussion” document as Sub Team’s report to the full WG during the Wednesday meeting. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry From: Gnso-rpm-providers <gnso-rpm-providers-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Date: Monday, July 30, 2018 at 10:48 AM To: "gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-providers] Suggested List of Issues for Discussion - URS Providers Survey Dear Providers Sub Team members, We hope you had a nice weekend. As per staff action item, please find attached the “Suggested List of Issues for Discussion – URS Providers Survey” in word and PDF format. The suggested list is developed based on staff’s observation and understanding of the Providers’ Sub Team review of the Providers Survey results. The list contains issues identified by the Sub Team for further discussion and as requested by the Sub Team, additional issues identified by staff based on the survey results. Findings/recommendations that appear suitable for presentation to the full Working Group are highlighted in green, and staff questions for the Sub Team have been highlighted in yellow (only three questions on page 6, 30, and 34). The issues and recommendations have been categorized using the same subheadings as in the “Consolidated URS Discussion Document [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_zxW8B&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dRzB-YypMqj9AZjlP_sZHORJtVF4M6AI0vip1lbQy10&m=T0Ei0D7TJK8raeqNCg8x6nTyyV0Vj_nZ27EFQqykR2E&s=d7mXwTrvYT1iOCTb86vCodGCH4X6iMQwGALbO36kPPg&e=>” previously agreed by the full Working Group and being reviewed by the Documents Sub Team. Staff anticipates that the “Consolidated URS Discussion Document” will remain the frame of reference for Working Group deliberations following each of the Sub Teams’ reports. For the full responses from the Providers and additional details, please refer to the "Responses & Notes - URS Provider Questions [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreads...>" spreadsheet. IMPORTANT: If you have any question or comment with regard to the suggested list, please send to the Sub Team mailing list by Wednesday, 30 July by 15:00 UTC. In that way, staff will be able to make revisions/edits to the document based on input received in time for the full WG meeting at 17:00 UTC. Thank you for your time and review! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry
participants (2)
-
Ariel Liang -
Corwin, Philip