Hello and thanks very much for the edits, Maxim! I’ve taken the liberty of adding Maxim’s comment about geo TLDs and Reserved Names lists to the Comments column accompanying Question 4, as well as expanded on Maxim’s note on the ALP/QLP data collection suggestion for Question 8, to describe the feedback provided by Amadeo at the Working Group’s discussion of this point in Johannesburg. Please let me know if the additions are inaccurate or inappropriate. I have kept the yellow highlights from the previous version, to show the changes that were made from the last Working Group call, and also highlighted the two additions described above in yellow. Thanks and cheers Mary From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 08:41 To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Cc: Lori Schulman <lschulman@inta.org>, Amr Elsadr <amr.elsadr@icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-rpm-sunrise] FOR REVIEW: Updated Sunrise document (re: Follow up from Sunrise Discussion of 2 weeks ago) Hello Mary, Please find my edits (1 small typo and two bits of text. My note from Q4 about release of reserved names disappeared again. The issue is - it is the only mechanism GEO tlds can use to deliver names to the city, which gave letter of approval/non-objection, via reservation of names and release during the special period (LRP). Also example of POLICE is highly relevant not only to Q12, for the following reason it is a public service of the city, reserved for the public interest. the other bit - is about ALP and info from CORE (Amadeu Abril) about at least 6 other applicants who had tried to apply for ALP.Since the Program was a disaster, and we received info from the party tried it (during F2F meeting in Joburg), We need to add it to the text. (I think that bit needs to be reworded into something more polite(though it is better then expressions used by Abril :) Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On Jul 27, 2017, at 01:01, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Sunrise Sub Team members, Please find attached the update Sunrise document as requested. You’ll see that the staff-suggested edits – which I believe address all the outstanding drafting issues that were raised on the 12 July call of the full Working Group – have all been highlighted in yellow. Please review them at your earliest convenience and let us know if you have comments, or if you think we may send these updates to the full Working Group for its further review. Thanks and cheers Mary From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 15:58 To: Lori Schulman <lschulman@inta.org<mailto:lschulman@inta.org>>, Amr Elsadr <amr.elsadr@icann.org<mailto:amr.elsadr@icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Ext] Follow up from Sunrise Discussion of 2 weeks ago Hi Lori and everyone, Staff will draft some suggested text for the Sub Team’s review, as requested, and send them to you all as soon as we can so that the proposed updates can be circulated to the full Working Group. We have also posted the INTA survey results summaries on the Working Group’s wiki page that houses documentation gathered by staff relating to the TMCH:https://community.icann.org/x/0AusAw[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_0AusAw&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=YeYI2UouDInyTmZxj8tO5cz4WH_B7vp_sBXAhPbuZws&s=9YccjcdeNlEu4U0bdS81q2SbFaRe-HeTJ62_owbbNEs&e=> (look for the “NEW” label in red, under the heading “METRICS, REVIEWS & EXTERNAL REPORTS” about halfway down the page). Thanks and cheers Mary From: Lori Schulman <lschulman@inta.org<mailto:lschulman@inta.org>> Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 10:43 To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>, Amr Elsadr <amr.elsadr@icann.org<mailto:amr.elsadr@icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] Follow up from Sunrise Discussion of 2 weeks ago Dear Mary and Amr, My apologies for not responding sooner but Mary had sent an email update with where we are on the completion of the Sunrise questions. She had asked whether staff could assist with updating the chart with the notes from the July 12th call. I can’t find the message but Mary and I did speak by phone last week and I am writing to confirm that I would be pleased to have staff’s assistance with adding the notes and then we send what should be a near final version to the Sunrise list before it goes back to the main list. We had discussed possible data sources to gather sunrise information. One of those is INTA’s cost impact study. While designed more to answer question from CCT-RT there is data here that could be useful to our analysis. The report was sent to all INTA members on June 26. INTA’s internet committee is still evaluating the outcomes and clarifying any open questions for the CCT-RT. Once we have substantially completed our analysis for CCT-RT my intention is to post to the full RPM list which should be in the next few weeks. If you would like an earlier glimpse of the report, it is posted on the CCT-RT wiki along with a high level presentation that I have to the CCT-RT on May 10, 2017. Lori Lori Schulman Senior Director, Internet Policy International Trademark Association 1250 Connecticut Avenue, Suite 200 Washington DC, USA +1-202-704-0408, skype: lsschulman www.inta.org[inta.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.inta.org_&d=DwMFAg&c...> Find us on: